2001
DOI: 10.3386/w8267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

36
620
2
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 436 publications
(672 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
36
620
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The term inequity aversion can be applied to the process of the chips distribution. Whereas in the game the participants were forcing egalitarian distribution of chips, in real life, this creates preferences for redistribution (Alesina and La Ferrara, 2005;Benz et al, 2002). If one cares only about the outcome, he will be less likely to support redistributive policies because if he gets rich he becomes a net payer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term inequity aversion can be applied to the process of the chips distribution. Whereas in the game the participants were forcing egalitarian distribution of chips, in real life, this creates preferences for redistribution (Alesina and La Ferrara, 2005;Benz et al, 2002). If one cares only about the outcome, he will be less likely to support redistributive policies because if he gets rich he becomes a net payer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a subjective factor in wage determination, fairness may be an important criterion which shapes lay attitudes of wage determination (see Paul, 2006) and may help to explain otherwise anomalous patterns in the data. Moreover, the relation of perceived fairness with wage determination may have a practical outcome: when the public perceives wage differentials as being unjust, it may take sociopolitical and economic action to rectify any perceived discrepancy (see Adams, 1965;Alesina & La Ferrara, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented above (as well as that provided by Alesina and La Ferrara 2001) suggest that there is "American exceptionalism," but that it relates not to the actual degree of vertical mobility in American society, but Americans' exceptionally strong belief that they live in a land of highly fluid vertical mobility, a land of relatively equal opportunity.…”
Section: Saving Rates and Perceptions Of The Potential For Vertical Mmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These differences may also help explain Americans' stronger embrace of laissez-faire political ideology (see also, Lipset 1998). Alesina and La Ferrara (2001) find that in the United States, those individuals who believe they will experience future income growth more readily oppose measures that would redistribute income in favor of the less-well off. Other evidence also suggests that to a greater extent Americans hold individuals responsible for their own fates.…”
Section: Saving Rates and Perceptions Of The Potential For Vertical Mmentioning
confidence: 94%