1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential Heterodimeric Parallel Coiled-coil Formation by Synthetic Max and c-Myc Leucine Zippers: A Description of Putative Electrostatic Interactions Responsible for the Specificity of Heterodimerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
106
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
106
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that this small region may represent a less complex structural target for Myc activity inhibition. Myc E57 and E64 are thought to be involved in interhelical electrostatic interactions, together with Max H60, responsible for heterodimerization specificity (Lavigne et al, 1995). Our data are only partly consistent with this model, as substitution of the two negatively charged glutamic residues with a polar and a nonpolar aminoacid (T and I) aected Myc heterodimerization with Max only weakly (Figure 3b), while it turned out to be essential for Myc homodimerization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…This implies that this small region may represent a less complex structural target for Myc activity inhibition. Myc E57 and E64 are thought to be involved in interhelical electrostatic interactions, together with Max H60, responsible for heterodimerization specificity (Lavigne et al, 1995). Our data are only partly consistent with this model, as substitution of the two negatively charged glutamic residues with a polar and a nonpolar aminoacid (T and I) aected Myc heterodimerization with Max only weakly (Figure 3b), while it turned out to be essential for Myc homodimerization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…For thermal denaturation, ellipticity at 222 nm was measured as a function of temperature. The data were fit using a two-state model (folded dimer and unfolded monomer) as described (21)(22)(23):…”
Section: Circular Dichroism (Cd) Spectroscopy and Denaturation Measurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When they are opposite in charge the e residue of one heptad often forms a salt bridge with the g residue of the previous heptad of the opposite helix (32). Such interactions contribute to specificity in FIGURE 5 SPR data presenting the interactions of SEPT6C, SEPT7C, SEPT8C, SEPT10C, and SEPT11C with each other.…”
Section: Primary Structure Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%