2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp410567c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential Solvation: Dividing Surface vs Excess Numbers

Abstract: How do osmolytes affect the conformation and configuration of supramolecular assembly, such as ion channel opening and actin polymerization? The key to the answer lies in the excess solvation numbers of water and osmolyte molecules; these numbers are determinable solely from experimental data, as guaranteed by the phase rule, as we show through the exact solution theory of Kirkwood and Buff (KB). The osmotic stress technique (OST), in contrast, purposes to yield alternative hydration numbers through the use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
332
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
332
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, let us divide the solution into two parts; the first part (called the "solute's vicinity") contains a solute molecule, the other part (called the "bulk") is far away from the solute. 6,7,23,27,40,41 To explore the thermodynamic consequence of this soluteinduced concentration change of the solvent species, let us first write down the Gibbs−Duhem equation for each part, vicinity (represented by *) and bulk: 6,7,23,27,40,41 …”
Section: Statistical Thermodynamic Theory Of Solute−hydrotrope Interamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Now, let us divide the solution into two parts; the first part (called the "solute's vicinity") contains a solute molecule, the other part (called the "bulk") is far away from the solute. 6,7,23,27,40,41 To explore the thermodynamic consequence of this soluteinduced concentration change of the solvent species, let us first write down the Gibbs−Duhem equation for each part, vicinity (represented by *) and bulk: 6,7,23,27,40,41 …”
Section: Statistical Thermodynamic Theory Of Solute−hydrotrope Interamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Gibbs−Duhem eqs 1 and 2 have now been rewritten explicitly in terms of the concentration change (n i * − n i ) in the solute's vicinity. 6,7,23,27,40,41 Now we introduce the excess solvation number of the species i around the solute defined as follows:…”
Section: Statistical Thermodynamic Theory Of Solute−hydrotrope Interamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) one obtains a number which would be 0 if the distribution were entirely average (no special interactions), positive for typical small molecules if the molecules have fairly strong interactions and negative for systems with unfavourable interactions. [14][15][16][17][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The values for systems of interest are readily found from the hydrotrope app discussed below. These numbers are called the Kirkwood-Buff Integrals (KBI) and the free energy of the system can be calculated on a rigorous, assumption-free basis from the KBI.…”
Section: Seishi Shimizumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the Introduction, the magnitude of stabilization or destabilization is quantified by the change in preferential hydration, W ∆Γ , 10,25,64,65 which in the following we designate ∆Γ for short. Since the lattice model is incompressible, so that ( ) 0 PV ∆ = (where P and V are the system pressure and volume, respectively), the enthalpic and energetic changes of any process 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 15 are necessarily identical.…”
Section: Changes In Thermodynamic Quantities Upon Macromolecular Surfmentioning
confidence: 99%