1986
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(86)90139-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential sputtering of oxides: A comparison of model predictions with experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, this peak position corresponds to Fe 3 + [21][22][23]. According to previously published CEMS measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] all the Fe cations in the Fe depth profile of the oxidized sample are initially present in the trivalent state.…”
Section: I Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 1, this peak position corresponds to Fe 3 + [21][22][23]. According to previously published CEMS measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] all the Fe cations in the Fe depth profile of the oxidized sample are initially present in the trivalent state.…”
Section: I Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These effects originate from differences in the surface binding energies and from mass differences [2]. In oxides the lattice oxygen generally is sputtered preferentially with respect to the metal ions [2,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using these values, the modification of the surface composition by ion bombardment is calculated and compared with experimental values. Results typical for this kind of study, including a model for the surface binding energy, are published by Malherbe et al [21]. Some simulation codes, e.g.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to X-rays, electron, ion, and other energetic particle exposures, which are frequently encountered for cleaning and/or depthprofiling, also cause reduction of certain metal ions to their lower oxidation states [29][30][31][32][33][34]. The extent of reduction varies drastically from one metal ion to another and extensive efforts had been devoted to correlate this with certain chemical/ physical properties of them [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. In one of our earlier work, we had claimed that the extent of X-ray induced reduction could be related with the electrochemical reduction potential of the metal ion [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%