2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preformed Protein-binding Motifs in 7SK snRNA: Structural and Thermodynamic Comparisons with Retroviral TAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their imino protons are broad, which indicate that these residues are in weak stacking and interactions, thus able to adopt other conformations not detectable by NMR. Our observations for M1 and M2 motifs are reminiscent of those reported for the 7SK HP4 RNA hairpin that comprises a dinucleotide CU bulge (Durney and D'Souza 2010). In HP4, the C residue was found to be positioned into the major groove in the proximity of a G:C base pair, although no direct hydrogen bond could be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Their imino protons are broad, which indicate that these residues are in weak stacking and interactions, thus able to adopt other conformations not detectable by NMR. Our observations for M1 and M2 motifs are reminiscent of those reported for the 7SK HP4 RNA hairpin that comprises a dinucleotide CU bulge (Durney and D'Souza 2010). In HP4, the C residue was found to be positioned into the major groove in the proximity of a G:C base pair, although no direct hydrogen bond could be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…SL4 is highly conserved in both sequence and secondary structure, with loop residue G312 100% conserved (22). The solution NMR structure of a human 7SK SL4 construct bound to arginine showed that bulge residue C320 forms an unusual base triple with the G303-C323 base pair (23), similar to the base triple observed in HIV TAR (2426). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These results provide further evidence that the CU bulge is not part of the xRRM binding site, and in fact decreases binding affinity. C320 in the CU bulge was proposed to form a base triple with the G303-C323 base pair in the lower stem in the free SL4 (23); whether this triple forms in the free RNA or when hLARP7 binds under the ITC buffer conditions, and if so, interferes with binding of helix α3x remains to be determined. Together, these data define the binding site for hLARP7 xRRM as the upper stem-loop of SL4 and indicate that the CU bulge does not contribute to specific binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to a model in which P-TEFb is held inactive by the 7SK snRNP in paused Pol II complexes until Tat mediates the transfer of P-TEFb to TAR and subsequent kinase activation. Although the molecular details are not yet clear, there is evidence that Tat may utilize two aspects of molecular mimicry during the activation process: first, the Tat AD appears to compete with Hexim1 for a shared binding surface on CycT1, and second, the Tat RBD appears to recognize a TAR-like motif (GA-UC) within the 5= stem-loop of 7SK snRNA, as well as an additional feature in the 3=-end stem-loop (2,25,53,54,70,95). Thus, while Tat alone is able to displace Hexim1 and extract P-TEFb from the 7SK snRNP complex in vitro and in vivo (2,21,54), the Tat-TAR interaction likely also plays a significant role in the context of actively transcribing complexes in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%