2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
183
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
22
183
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The localization of the group differences in activation in the medial frontal cortex and precuneus is consistent with data from previous neuroimaging studies of SWM in schizophrenia (Gould et al 2003 ;Curtis, 2006). A different pattern of activation across groups was evident during the least demanding (' easy ') version of the task.…”
Section: Group Differences In Activationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The localization of the group differences in activation in the medial frontal cortex and precuneus is consistent with data from previous neuroimaging studies of SWM in schizophrenia (Gould et al 2003 ;Curtis, 2006). A different pattern of activation across groups was evident during the least demanding (' easy ') version of the task.…”
Section: Group Differences In Activationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Consistent with this idea of retrieval, Silk et al (2010) have suggested that the motor planning map retained by neural activity in the right SMG is used as a basis for the control of attentional shifts. This highlights the close association that has been found to exist between the mechanisms of memory and attention in the PPC proposed by many studies (Jonides, Smith, Koeppe, Awh, Minoshima & Mintun, 1993;Smith & Jonides, 1997;Courtney, Ungerleider, Keil & Haxby, 1997;Vandenburgh et al, 1996;Nobre et al, 1997;Ungerleider, Courtney & Haxby, 1998;Kessels, d'Alfonso, Postma & de Haan, 2000;Corbetta et al, 2000;Hussain et al, 2001;Rizzolatti & Matelli, 2003: Koch, Oliveri, Torriero, Carlesimo, Turriziani & Caltagirone, 2005Curtis, 2006;Van Asselen, Kesseks, Neggers, Kapelle, Frijns & Postma, 2006;Berryhill & Olson, 2008a,b;Olson & Berryhill, 2009;Cabeza, Ciaramelli & Moscovitch, 2012;Corbetta & Shulman, 2002;Singh-Curry & Husain, 2009). One view is that attention and memory rely upon overlapping cortical networks sharing common neural resources within the PPC (Awh, Jonides & Reuter-Lorenz, 1998;Awh, Vogel & Oh, 2006;Postle Awh, Jonides, Smith & D'Esposito, 2004;Theeuwes, Belopolsky & Olivers, 2009).…”
Section: Dorso-parietal Versus Ventro-parietal Processing Pathwayssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, in the present study, no brain regions (within or outside of the MTL) exhibited suprathreshold delay period activation in the accuracy contrast. This could not be attributed to an absence of delay period activity, however, because when the data from correct and incorrect trials were collapsed, persistent activity during the delay period was evident in a network of brain regions (e.g., bilateral frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex, along with supplementary eye fields and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) that are typically implicated in spatial short-term memory tasks (Curtis, 2006). These results are reported in the supplemental Results section (supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Activationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One possibility is that the relative absence of hippocampal activity in these experiments reflects use of strategies that obviate relational memory processing demands. For instance, participants may have retained object-location bindings in viewer-centered coordinates, a process that may be more dependent on prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices (Constantinidis and Wang, 2004;Curtis, 2006) than MTL structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%