2012
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregestational body mass index is related to neonatal abdominal circumference at birth—a Danish population‐based study

Abstract: Objectives To examine the impact of maternal pregestational body mass index (BMI) and smoking on neonatal abdominal circumference (AC) and weight at birth. To define reference curves for birth AC and weight in offspring of healthy, nonsmoking, normal weight women.Design Population-based study. Main outcome measures Birth AC and weight in relation to pregestational maternal BMI, maternal smoking and medical conditions (any).Results Birth AC and weight increased with increasing pregestational BMI, and decreased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, only 9% of the children of obese women were classified as overweight or obese at the age of 2.8 years. The prevalence of being overweight or obese and the mean birth weight were similar to the general Danish population [4], [30]. Accordingly, we would suggest that the women who participated in our follow-up study represented a group of obese women who were motivated by health-promotion, and that the children benefitted from their motherś voluntary participation in the LiP study, regardless of the randomization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, only 9% of the children of obese women were classified as overweight or obese at the age of 2.8 years. The prevalence of being overweight or obese and the mean birth weight were similar to the general Danish population [4], [30]. Accordingly, we would suggest that the women who participated in our follow-up study represented a group of obese women who were motivated by health-promotion, and that the children benefitted from their motherś voluntary participation in the LiP study, regardless of the randomization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Potential confounders included maternal age, parity, educational level (school ≥12 years), GWG, smoking during pregnancy, breastfeeding (exclusive breastfeeding for at least 5 months), birth weight Z-score and post natal excessive growth. Birth weight Z-scores were calculated from recently published gestational age and sex-specific Danish birth weight standards [4], and excessive growth was estimated by investigating changes in weight Z-scores (calculated from the current Danish reference [21]) from 0 to 12 months. Only children with information on all the above variables were included, and since we did not have information on glucose values during pregnancy in the reference group, this variable was not included in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, it is possible ascertainment bias that may influence our findings, though all pregnancies with previously documented fetal growth abnormalities were excluded. We lacked data on additional potential confounders such as body mass index, alcohol intake and smoking during pregnancy [24-26], Data on the indication for preterm delivery was retrospectively collected from non-standardized provider documentation and thus was subject to interpretation by reviewers, though variability was minimized by independent reviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy pregnant women, obesity predisposes to fetal overgrowth (14,15), and the risk increases with rising prepregnancy BMI (16). Excessive gestational weight gain has been identified as yet another emerging risk factor for neonatal overweight (16)(17)(18), whereas low gestational weight gain has been shown to be associated with the birth of small-for-gestational-age infants (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%