1999
DOI: 10.1080/02646839908404581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy may confer a selective cognitive advantage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of previous studies have asked only for ratings of general memory ability (Brindle et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1999;Christensen et al, 1999;Janes et al, 1999;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993). Those that have examined other aspects of cognition Kane et al, 1968;Parsons and Redman, 1991;Poser et al, 1986) have shown that in addition to memory difficulties, some pregnant women also report increased absentmindedness and impairments in concentration, reading ability and clarity of thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of previous studies have asked only for ratings of general memory ability (Brindle et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1999;Christensen et al, 1999;Janes et al, 1999;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993). Those that have examined other aspects of cognition Kane et al, 1968;Parsons and Redman, 1991;Poser et al, 1986) have shown that in addition to memory difficulties, some pregnant women also report increased absentmindedness and impairments in concentration, reading ability and clarity of thought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welch, 1991). Evidence for such an impairment has not always been forthcoming from studies using objective measures of cognitive performance (Christensen et al, 1999) and sometimes the evidence has been contradictory (Brindle et al, 1991;McDowell and Moriarty, 2000;Sharp et al, 1993;Janes et al, 1999). Even where measurable changes have been apparent, the performance of the pregnant women is still often within the normal range Keenan et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have failed to find any differences in scores on objective measures of cognitive functions during pregnancy and postpartum (Casey, 2000;Christensen, Poyser, Pollitt, & Cubis, 1999;Crawley, Dennison, & Carter, 2003;Harris, Deary, Harris Marlene, Lees, & Wilson, 1996;McDowall, 2000), even though participants often reported subjective cognitive difficulties (Christensen et al, 1999;Crawley et al, 2003;McDowall, 2000). It has been suggested that testing in a laboratory setting may underestimate the degree of impairment experienced in day-to-day life (Cuttler, Graf, Pawluski, & Galea, 2011;Rendell & Henry, 2008;).…”
Section: Cihr Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, impairments on word list learning tasks have been observed during different trimesters and at postpartum (de Groot, Vuurman, Hormstra, & Jolles, 2006; Mickes, Wixted, Sha piro, & Scarff, 2009;Parsons et al, 2004). Furthermore, perfor mance on paragraph recall (Keenan, Yaldoo, Stress, Fuerst, & Ginsburg, 1998), planning (Jarrahi-Zadeh, Kane, Van De Castle, Lachenbruch, & Ewing, 1969), and cognitive speed tasks (Chris tensen, Leach, & Mackinnon, 2010) was worse only in the third trimester.Others have failed to find any differences in scores on objective measures of cognitive functions during pregnancy and postpartum (Casey, 2000;Christensen, Poyser, Pollitt, & Cubis, 1999;Crawley, Dennison, & Carter, 2003;Harris, Deary, Harris Marlene, Lees, & Wilson, 1996;McDowall, 2000), even though participants often reported subjective cognitive difficulties (Christensen et al, 1999;Crawley et al, 2003;McDowall, 2000). It has been suggested that testing in a laboratory setting may underestimate the degree of impairment experienced in day-to-day life (Cuttler, Graf, Pawluski, & Galea, 2011;Rendell & Henry, 2008;).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%