1999
DOI: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780414.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix

Abstract: Laser vaporization of the uterine cervix does not influence the outcome of subsequent pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the different types of treatment were compared, cone biopsy, diathermy and LEEP (but not laser ablation) appeared to place women at increased risk for preterm birth. The findings of smaller studies 14,32–34 and a systematic review 12 support our finding that laser ablation does not appear to place treated women at an additional risk for preterm birth compared with untreated women.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…When the different types of treatment were compared, cone biopsy, diathermy and LEEP (but not laser ablation) appeared to place women at increased risk for preterm birth. The findings of smaller studies 14,32–34 and a systematic review 12 support our finding that laser ablation does not appear to place treated women at an additional risk for preterm birth compared with untreated women.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…There may be differences in perinatal outcome by different surgical treatments for CIN. While ablative treatments do not seem to affect subsequent pregnancies (5–9), there may be an adverse perinatal outcome with an increased risk of preterm birth after LEEP and CLC. Mechanisms proposed include lack of mechanical support due to shortened length of the cervix, impairment of antimicrobial defence mechanisms after removal of cervical glands, and, thereby, alteration of cervicovaginal bacterial flora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatments for CIN may affect the outcome of later pregnancies, although data on this are contradictory. While ablative treatments do not seem to have an adverse effect (5–9), results on pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cervical laser conisation (CLC) are conflicting (10–15). The main difference between ablative and excisional methods is removal of cervical tissue, and, thereby, the extent of tissue damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several publications in recent years describe an association between the outcome of pregnancy and preterm delivery after conization of the cervix (87–90). Most studies have been conducted using the cold knife technique (88).…”
Section: Conization Of the Cervix And Preterm Labormentioning
confidence: 99%