2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy outcome predictors in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The women without APS laboratory and clinical risk factors, who experienced pregnancy failure while being treated with heparin/LDA, were defined as “refractory obstetric APS,” whereas APS patients with one or more laboratory and/or clinical risk factors who may or may not have experienced adverse pregnancy outcomes despite treatment with heparin/LDA were defined as “high-risk and/or refractory obstetric APS”. In accordance with the literature ( Sailer et al, 2006 ; Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Lockshin et al, 2012 ; Matsuki et al, 2015 ; Latino et al, 2017 ; Saccone et al, 2017 ; Walter et al, 2021 ) laboratory risk factors were considered: persistent LA positivity alone or any combination of LA with IgG/IgM aCL antibodies or IgG/IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies and triple aPL positivity (LA + IgG/IgM aCL antibodies + IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI antibodies). As highlighted in the literature ( Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Walter et al, 2021 ), thrombosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and previous severe pregnancy complications were considered clinical risk factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The women without APS laboratory and clinical risk factors, who experienced pregnancy failure while being treated with heparin/LDA, were defined as “refractory obstetric APS,” whereas APS patients with one or more laboratory and/or clinical risk factors who may or may not have experienced adverse pregnancy outcomes despite treatment with heparin/LDA were defined as “high-risk and/or refractory obstetric APS”. In accordance with the literature ( Sailer et al, 2006 ; Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Lockshin et al, 2012 ; Matsuki et al, 2015 ; Latino et al, 2017 ; Saccone et al, 2017 ; Walter et al, 2021 ) laboratory risk factors were considered: persistent LA positivity alone or any combination of LA with IgG/IgM aCL antibodies or IgG/IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies and triple aPL positivity (LA + IgG/IgM aCL antibodies + IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI antibodies). As highlighted in the literature ( Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Walter et al, 2021 ), thrombosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and previous severe pregnancy complications were considered clinical risk factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with the literature ( Sailer et al, 2006 ; Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Lockshin et al, 2012 ; Matsuki et al, 2015 ; Latino et al, 2017 ; Saccone et al, 2017 ; Walter et al, 2021 ) laboratory risk factors were considered: persistent LA positivity alone or any combination of LA with IgG/IgM aCL antibodies or IgG/IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies and triple aPL positivity (LA + IgG/IgM aCL antibodies + IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI antibodies). As highlighted in the literature ( Ruffatti et al, 2011 ; Walter et al, 2021 ), thrombosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and previous severe pregnancy complications were considered clinical risk factors. Severe pregnancy complications referred to one or more of the following: eclampsia, preeclampsia (new-onset hypertension ≥140/90 mm Hg and proteinuria ≥300 mg per 24-h urine collection protein), placental insufficiency (abnormal Doppler flow velocimetry waveform analysis of uterine arteries), hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) defined as postnatal birth weight less than 10th percentile for gestational age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta-analysis demonstrated that triple positivity was associated with a lower probability of having live birth, increased risk of preeclampsia, and having a low birth weight for gestational age. In addition, aL-positive patients were at increased risk of preeclampsia and preterm delivery [ 41 ]. The same meta-analysis showed that a history of thrombosis was also associated with a lower likelihood of having live birth, increased neonatal mortality, increased risk of prenatal or postpartum thrombosis, and increased risk of having a newborn with low weight for gestational age [ 41 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, aL-positive patients were at increased risk of preeclampsia and preterm delivery [ 41 ]. The same meta-analysis showed that a history of thrombosis was also associated with a lower likelihood of having live birth, increased neonatal mortality, increased risk of prenatal or postpartum thrombosis, and increased risk of having a newborn with low weight for gestational age [ 41 ]. Women negative for aL and with a single positive aCL or anti-β2GPI antibody result have a lower risk of adverse gestational outcomes, as do women with low antibody titers and positive IgM isotype results [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%