Pregnancy Outcomes After Paternal Radiofrequency Field Exposure Aboard Fast Patrol Boats

Baste, Valborg; Moen, Bente E.; Oftedal, Gunnhild; Strand, Leif Åge; Bjørge, Line; Mild, Kjell Hansson

doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e3182445003

Cited by 18 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…When comparing the rates in the last ve-year period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) with the previous one (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) (Table 15 a and b) we observe that:…”

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patients diagnosed in 2010-2015 contribute with (part of ) their survival experience the rst year of follow up, patients diagnosed in [2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014] contribute to the second year of follow-up, patients diagnosed in [2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013] contribute to the third year of follow-up etc. us, the period approach consists of the pieces of survival experience observed in the period 2011-2015 for all patients who have been diagnosed up to 15 years ago.…”

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this report, we have used a ve-year period window (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) to estimate relative survival up to 15 years. Patients diagnosed in 2010-2015 contribute with (part of ) their survival experience the rst year of follow up, patients diagnosed in [2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014] contribute to the second year of follow-up, patients diagnosed in [2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013] contribute to the third year of follow-up etc.…”

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…us, the period approach consists of the pieces of survival experience observed in the period 2011-2015 for all patients who have been diagnosed up to 15 years ago. e period-approach was also used to estimate ve-year relative survival for the most recent period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015), where full ve-year follow-up is not observed. When analyzing time trends in ve-year relative survival rolling ve-year cohorts was used to obtain smoother curves.…”

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Kreftpasient i 50-årene med plagsom hjertebank

Vandraas¹,

Torfoss²,

Berstad³

et al. 2017

Tidsskriftet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…When comparing the rates in the last ve-year period (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) with the previous one (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) (Table 15 a and b) we observe that:…”

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cancer In Norway 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Kreftpasient i 50-årene med plagsom hjertebank

Vandraas¹,

Torfoss²,

Berstad³

et al. 2017

Tidsskriftet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…20,[93][94][95] Case-control studies also can associate a specific adverse outcome with paternal exposure. 96 Such studies are very important in hypothesis generating for genetic damage to sperm, however, genetic damage is difficult to detect in human sperm.…”

Section: Testesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy

Thatcher

Meyer²,

Danet-Desnoyers³

2015

Computational Methods for Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk: Application of the INTEROCC job‐exposure matrix

Turuban,

Kromhout,

Vila

et al. 2024

Intl Journal of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMF, 100 kHz to 300 GHz) are classified by IARC as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). This study evaluates the potential association between occupational RF‐EMF exposure and brain tumor risk, utilizing for the first time, a RF‐EMF job‐exposure matrix (RF‐JEM) developed in the multi‐country INTEROCC case–control study. Cumulative and time‐weighted average (TWA) occupational RF‐EMF exposures were estimated for study participants based on lifetime job histories linked to the RF‐JEM using three different methods: (1) by considering RF‐EMF intensity among all exposed jobs, (2) by considering RF‐EMF intensity among jobs with an exposure prevalence ≥ the median exposure prevalence of all exposed jobs, and (3) by considering RF‐EMF intensity of jobs of participants who reported RF‐EMF source use. Stratified conditional logistic regression models were used, considering various lag periods and exposure time windows defined a priori. Generally, no clear associations were found for glioma or meningioma risk. However, some statistically significant positive associations were observed including in the highest exposure categories for glioma for cumulative and TWA exposure in the 1‐ to 4‐year time window for electric fields (E) in the first JEM application method (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.08, 1.72 and 1.27, 95% CI 1.01, 1.59, respectively), as well as for meningioma for cumulative exposure in the 5‐ to 9‐year time window for electric fields (E) in the third JEM application method (OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.11, 4.78). We did not identify convincing associations between occupational RF‐EMF exposure and risk of glioma or meningioma.

show abstract

Pregnancy Outcomes After Paternal Radiofrequency Field Exposure Aboard Fast Patrol Boats

Cited by 18 publications

References 33 publications

Kreftpasient i 50-årene med plagsom hjertebank

Kreftpasient i 50-årene med plagsom hjertebank

Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy

Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk: Application of the INTEROCC job‐exposure matrix

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About