2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reported 10 cases of adnexal mass removal during pregnancy using SPLS and the obstetric outcomes for each patient were optimal. We have also summarized the literature about the single port approach during pregnancy in Table 4 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). To our knowledge, only seven studies have reported the use of SPLS for adnexal mass removal during pregnancy (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We reported 10 cases of adnexal mass removal during pregnancy using SPLS and the obstetric outcomes for each patient were optimal. We have also summarized the literature about the single port approach during pregnancy in Table 4 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). To our knowledge, only seven studies have reported the use of SPLS for adnexal mass removal during pregnancy (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also summarized the literature about the single port approach during pregnancy in Table 4 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). To our knowledge, only seven studies have reported the use of SPLS for adnexal mass removal during pregnancy (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Jiang et al (8) (11)(12)(13)(14) detailed two, one, nine, and six case reports, respectively, where SPLS was performed on an adnexal mass during pregnancy, and the obstetric outcomes were also good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though widely considered safe and feasible for gynaecologic disease, many clinicians have been hesitant to perform LESS in pregnant women, due to the scarcity of relevant literature and relatively high-quality evidence. Few multicentre studies involving patients undergoing LESS during pregnancy have been reported to date, 10 , 17 and the role of LESS in surgical intervention during pregnancy remains unclear. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the role of LESS during pregnancy, by retrospectively comparing LESS with conventional laparoscopic surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%