Prehospital Emergency Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: An under-developed and fragmented prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system is a major obstacle to the timely care of emergency patients. Insufficient emphasis on prehospital emergency systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) currently causes a substantial number of avoidable deaths from time-sensitive illnesses, highlighting a critical need for improved prehospital emergency care systems. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the prehospital emergency care services across LMICs. Methods: This systematic review used four electronic databases, namely: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SCOPUS, to search for published reports on prehospital emergency medical care in LMICs. Only peer-reviewed studies published in English language from January 1, 2010 through November 1, 2022 were included in the review. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Further, the protocol of this systematic review has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Ref: CRD42022371936) and has been conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Of the 4,909 identified studies, a total of 87 studies met the inclusion criteria and were therefore included in the review. Prehospital emergency care structure, transport care, prehospital times, health outcomes, quality of information exchange, and patient satisfaction were the most reported outcomes in the considered studies. Conclusions: The prehospital care system in LMICs is fragmented and uncoordinated, lacking trained medical personnel and first responders, inadequate basic materials, and substandard infrastructure.

Triage practices for emergency care delivery: a qualitative study among febrile patients and healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal

“…In Sub-Saharan Africa, emergency care was found to be sub-optimal with only 16 out of 48 countries able to offer optimal emergency care services to 80% of the population who lived within a two-hour travel time from the nearest hospital [ 19 ]. The lack of well-equipped ambulances, pre-hospital care, trained personnel, and advanced medical technologies restrain the timely and effective care of patients' critical conditions [ 17 , 20 ]. The shortcomings of health services were further increased during the COVID-19 pandemic where several reports attributed poor services to constraints in resources [ 21 , 22 ].…”

Effect of Rural Trauma Team Development on the Outcomes of Motorcycle Accident–Related Injuries (Motor Registry Project): Protocol for a Multicenter Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Further, level III evidence suggests that prolonged prehospital times may be associated with increased mortality among trauma patients [ 31 ]. However, it is unclear how these results relate to time-sensitive orthopedic and neurological injuries in LMICs that lack formal coordinated prehospital systems [ 32 ]. Thus, our process outcome measure variables were selected within the context of evidence-based practice.…”

Pakistan's Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system & out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA): A narrative review of an EMS system of a low middle income country in context of OHCA

“…However, the EMS landscape, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), is often fragmented, with disparities even within the same country, posing significant challenges to timely and efficient emergency care. 2 In many low-middle-income countries (LMICs), the challenge extends beyond the scope of emergency medical services (EMS) as merely a mode of transportation; transportation itself is a significant issue, compounded by inadequate infrastructure, limited accessibility in rural and remote areas, and the scarcity of vehicles equipped for medical emergencies. Consequently, many LMICs utilize EMS primarily as a means of transport, often without the essential components such as field triage, standardized care practices, and effective communication with receiving healthcare facilities.…”