1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prehospital Pulseless, Unconscious Penetrating Trauma Victims

Abstract: Functional survival was rare but did occur with penetrating trauma presenting pulseless and unconscious in the out-of-hospital setting. Although the presence of a pulseless sinus rhythm or tachycardia and stabbing as a mechanism seemed to indicate better survival rates, our study failed to identify reliable out-of-hospital criteria to separate salvageable penetrating trauma victims from those who are nonsalvageable. With this lack of reliable criteria, aggressive prehospital resuscitation efforts and rapid tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Initial reports on the use of resuscitative thoracotomy in the emergency department (ED) seemed to hold some promise for injured patients with cardiopulmonary arrest (12%-20% survival rate) [2][3][4] ; however, in spite of advances in medical care, most recent reports indicate that trauma patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have a dismal prognosis (survival rate, 0%-5%). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] This abysmal survival rate has led to a less aggressive resuscitative approach and a more restricted use of resuscitative thoracotomy in trauma victims presenting in cardiopulmonary arrest. Many patients are now pronounced dead on arrival shortly after reaching the ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Initial reports on the use of resuscitative thoracotomy in the emergency department (ED) seemed to hold some promise for injured patients with cardiopulmonary arrest (12%-20% survival rate) [2][3][4] ; however, in spite of advances in medical care, most recent reports indicate that trauma patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have a dismal prognosis (survival rate, 0%-5%). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] This abysmal survival rate has led to a less aggressive resuscitative approach and a more restricted use of resuscitative thoracotomy in trauma victims presenting in cardiopulmonary arrest. Many patients are now pronounced dead on arrival shortly after reaching the ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evidence is quite clear that prehospital procedures such as endotracheal intubation and intravenous (IV) line placement benefit rural blunt trauma victims with prolonged transportation time, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] data are less convincing for critical patients with penetrating injuries in the urban setting who are rapidly transported to the hospital. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] We theorized that prehospital healthcare personnel are performing more procedures in the field today, thereby delaying arrival to the hospital and the administration of definitive care-namely emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) and surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in medical care, survival rates of 0% to 2% have been consistently reported for blunt trauma patients who arrive at a trauma center with no signs of life (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Unfortunately, many of these survivors experience severe permanent neurologic disability (5,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%