1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80114-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prehospital use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a helicopter ambulance program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the higher success rates of rapid sequence intubation versus other techniques of airway management in our data are consistent with numerous other studies in the recent literature. 2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] That rapid sequence intubation was superior to nasotracheal intubation, despite the fact that most nasotracheal intubations came from a center that does them quite regularly, is further evidence (though nonrandomized) that rapid sequence intubation is usually the optimal choice for patients who do not present with cardiac arrest. Given the accumulated evidence of rapid sequence intubation's superiority in the abovementioned nonrandomized comparisons, it would probably be unethical to initiate a randomized trial of rapid sequence intubation versus other techniques at this point, and we will likely never see such a study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the higher success rates of rapid sequence intubation versus other techniques of airway management in our data are consistent with numerous other studies in the recent literature. 2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] That rapid sequence intubation was superior to nasotracheal intubation, despite the fact that most nasotracheal intubations came from a center that does them quite regularly, is further evidence (though nonrandomized) that rapid sequence intubation is usually the optimal choice for patients who do not present with cardiac arrest. Given the accumulated evidence of rapid sequence intubation's superiority in the abovementioned nonrandomized comparisons, it would probably be unethical to initiate a randomized trial of rapid sequence intubation versus other techniques at this point, and we will likely never see such a study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of neuromuscular blocking agents has been touted by our trauma and emergency department colleagues to improve intubating conditions and the percentage of successful tracheal intubations [16][17][18]. Airway management has been described as being more difficult without these agents under emergent conditions, although 80% of the patients in this database were intubated with no medication, topical anesthesia, or sedative-hypnotics alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,17,18,24,32,34,37,38,40,50,74,75,80 Some investigators endorse tracheal intubation for profuse vomiting by inclusion as an intubation protocol criterion or as a conclusion after analysis of a patient study. 14,70 Several American and European professional organizations and societies advocate emergency tracheal intubation for postinjury severe cognitive impairment (GCS score Յ 8).…”
Section: Scientific Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%