2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, downstream developmental processes can be irreparably compromised by removing a cell from the embryo. Such an impact is also reflected in a lower blastocyst rate after cleavage-stage biopsy with respect to undisturbed embryos, as reported in several papers [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, downstream developmental processes can be irreparably compromised by removing a cell from the embryo. Such an impact is also reflected in a lower blastocyst rate after cleavage-stage biopsy with respect to undisturbed embryos, as reported in several papers [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It took above noted Dutch study [2] to stop to a degree this worldwide utilization of PGS. Other studies later reaffirmed the results reported by Mastenbroek et al [3][4][5][6]. Professional organizations followed by unequivocally concluding that PGS, at current practice levels, did not improve clinical IVF outcomes [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In such patients a day-3 embryo transfer may result in a viable pregnancy, while the same marginal embryo, cultured to days-5/6, may not survive prolonged culture. As a consequence, PGS#2, like PGS#1 before [2][3][4][5][6] in DOR patients may, therefore, actually reduce pregnancy chances.…”
Section: The Misdirection Of Ongoing Studies Of Pgs#2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to expectation, results from numerous studies did not show that the PGS-FISH was capable of improving live birth rates in patients of advanced maternal age, with recurrent implantation failure or repeated pregnancy loss [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. This is because FISH screening does not make it possible to test for all 23 chromosome pairs.…”
Section: Time Lapse Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 83%