2012
DOI: 10.1002/bdrc.21022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preimplantation Stress and Development

Abstract: The developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis holds that inappropriate environmental cues in utero, a period marked by tremendous developmental sensitivity, facilitate cellular reprogramming to ultimately predispose disease in adulthood. In this review, we analyze if stress during early stages of development can affect future health. This has wide clinical importance, given that 5 million children have been conceived with assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Because the primary outcome of ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(227 reference statements)
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the IVF process, both gametes and the pre-implantation embryos are exposed to in vitro conditions that do not perfectly recapitulate the normal environment of the Fallopian tube and uterus (Feuer & Rinaudo 2012), in which genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming occurs (Reik 2007, Cockburn & Rossant 2010. Moreover, male and female embryos differ in their chromosomal complement, transcriptome, proteome and subsequent metabolome (Kobayashi et al 2006, Bermejo-Alvarez et al 2010, Gardner et al 2010, and in their epigenetic processes, including X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) (Takagi & Sasaki 1975), DNA methylation (Bermejo-Alvarez et al 2008, Gebert et al 2009) and gene imprinting (Kobayashi et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the IVF process, both gametes and the pre-implantation embryos are exposed to in vitro conditions that do not perfectly recapitulate the normal environment of the Fallopian tube and uterus (Feuer & Rinaudo 2012), in which genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming occurs (Reik 2007, Cockburn & Rossant 2010. Moreover, male and female embryos differ in their chromosomal complement, transcriptome, proteome and subsequent metabolome (Kobayashi et al 2006, Bermejo-Alvarez et al 2010, Gardner et al 2010, and in their epigenetic processes, including X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) (Takagi & Sasaki 1975), DNA methylation (Bermejo-Alvarez et al 2008, Gebert et al 2009) and gene imprinting (Kobayashi et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reporting long-term consequences of in vitro culture or other ART identified a sex bias in the frequency and nature of the long-term effect (FernandezGonzalez et al 2004, Sjoblom et al 2005, Feuer & Rinaudo 2012, Tarin et al 2014. These deleterious effects have pointed to epigenetic alterations produced by ARTs.…”
Section: Sex-specific Long-term Effects Mediated By Assisted Reproducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous report, there is no significant difference in the distribution of body fat from 4 to 14 years old children between IVF and natural mating [20]. Donjacur et al have detected the distribution of body lean and fat mass in IVF offspring by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning, and found that the fat mass exhibits an obvious increase as the extension of age [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%