1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00168689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prejunctional muscarine receptors in the rabbit ear artery differ from M1, M2 and M3 muscarine receptors

Abstract: The ability of several selective muscarine receptor antagonists to inhibit the effect of carbachol on prejunctional muscarine receptors on sympathetic nerve endings in the rabbit isolated ear artery was investigated to characterise the receptor subtype involved. Carbachol did not reduce responses to exogenous noradrenaline and the inhibitory effect of carbachol on responses to nerve stimulation was unaffected by hexamethonium (10 microM) indicating that the effect of the muscarine agonist was exerted prejuncti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…trihexyphenidyl (anity pro®le as compiled from Lazareno et al, 1990;DoÈ rje et al, 1991;Waelbroeck et al, 1992;Bognar et al, 1992;Doods et al, 1993;Onali et al, 1994 being M 1 (9.0) = M 4 (8.8) 4 M 3 (8.3) 4 M 2 (7.8)) and tropicamide (M 4 (7.8) 4 M 1 (7.3) = M 2 (7.2) = M 3 (7.2); Lararenzo et al, 1990;Doods et al, 1993;Lazareno & Birdsall, 1993;Rinken, 1995). It was found that trihexyphenidyl behaved like the M 3 selective compounds, yielding a pK B value (7.64+0.10, n=12, estimated with concentrations ranging from 0.03 ± 1.0 mM, slope of the Schild plot 1.15+0.09, n=3) that resembled M 2 but not M 3 or M 4 anities; by contrast, tropicamide yielded a pK B value (6.57+0.06, n=14, 0.3 ± 30 mM, slope 1.03+0.03) that was actually too low to correlate to any known muscarinic receptor subtype, behaviour which is reminiscent of trihexyphenidyl in rabbit iris sphincter and rabbit ear artery (Bognar et al, 1992;Darroch et al, 1992). Clearly, these compounds do not support a characterization of the muscarinic receptors mediating contraction of the guinea-pig lung strip as M 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trihexyphenidyl (anity pro®le as compiled from Lazareno et al, 1990;DoÈ rje et al, 1991;Waelbroeck et al, 1992;Bognar et al, 1992;Doods et al, 1993;Onali et al, 1994 being M 1 (9.0) = M 4 (8.8) 4 M 3 (8.3) 4 M 2 (7.8)) and tropicamide (M 4 (7.8) 4 M 1 (7.3) = M 2 (7.2) = M 3 (7.2); Lararenzo et al, 1990;Doods et al, 1993;Lazareno & Birdsall, 1993;Rinken, 1995). It was found that trihexyphenidyl behaved like the M 3 selective compounds, yielding a pK B value (7.64+0.10, n=12, estimated with concentrations ranging from 0.03 ± 1.0 mM, slope of the Schild plot 1.15+0.09, n=3) that resembled M 2 but not M 3 or M 4 anities; by contrast, tropicamide yielded a pK B value (6.57+0.06, n=14, 0.3 ± 30 mM, slope 1.03+0.03) that was actually too low to correlate to any known muscarinic receptor subtype, behaviour which is reminiscent of trihexyphenidyl in rabbit iris sphincter and rabbit ear artery (Bognar et al, 1992;Darroch et al, 1992). Clearly, these compounds do not support a characterization of the muscarinic receptors mediating contraction of the guinea-pig lung strip as M 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rabbit ear artery the sympathetic nerves appear to have at least two types of inhibitory prejunctional muscarine receptors as a number of antagonists indicate different affinities for CCh and McN (Choo et al 1985(Choo et al , 1986Darroch et al 1990). For example pirenzepine was found to be approximately 20-fold more potent and AF-DX 116 three-fold less potent when McN rather than CCh was the agonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%