2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prélèvement suprafascial du lambeau antébrachial radial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of previous research are ambiguous: a significant limitation in range of motion at the harvesting site [23] is shown in some and disproven in other studies [12]. Kamal et al showed equal or better clinical outcomes by adopting the suprafascial dissection technique compared to the infrafascial with regard to tendon adhesion (0 vs. 0) and sensory nerve damage at donor site (0 vs. 2), with an equal number of flap failure (1/1) [24]. When comparing defect coverage of a suprafascial dissection technique by FTSG to STSG plus a negative wound pressure, initial graft taking is as high as 96 % in 5 days and 100 % in a month [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of previous research are ambiguous: a significant limitation in range of motion at the harvesting site [23] is shown in some and disproven in other studies [12]. Kamal et al showed equal or better clinical outcomes by adopting the suprafascial dissection technique compared to the infrafascial with regard to tendon adhesion (0 vs. 0) and sensory nerve damage at donor site (0 vs. 2), with an equal number of flap failure (1/1) [24]. When comparing defect coverage of a suprafascial dissection technique by FTSG to STSG plus a negative wound pressure, initial graft taking is as high as 96 % in 5 days and 100 % in a month [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%