2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001gl013307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary analysis of an expanded corona database for Venus

Abstract: Abstract. We have conducted an extensive survey of the Magellan data to reassess the population of coronae. We identify a new type of coronae, here referred to as 'Type 2 coronae', having the same basic morphology as previously identified coronae (Type 1), but lacking a significant (>50%) annulus of closely spaced fractures. 106 Type 2 coronae are included in the new database giving a total of 515 coronae on Venus. The characteristics of the expanded population of Type 1 coronae are similar to those of the pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
150
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that there is not a significant correlation between lithospheric parameters and the frequency distribution of volcanoes and coronae, whose patterns closely mimic the distribution of T e and F on the surface. Although we do not show it here for brevity, there are no significant differences in lithospheric properties between Type 1 and Type 2 coronae (see Coronae Type definition by Stofan et al, 2001), confirming the previous observations of Smrekar and Stofan (2003). The only noticeable difference is a slight trend towards smaller F values, and maybe towards higher T e values, in the frequency distribution of coronae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that there is not a significant correlation between lithospheric parameters and the frequency distribution of volcanoes and coronae, whose patterns closely mimic the distribution of T e and F on the surface. Although we do not show it here for brevity, there are no significant differences in lithospheric properties between Type 1 and Type 2 coronae (see Coronae Type definition by Stofan et al, 2001), confirming the previous observations of Smrekar and Stofan (2003). The only noticeable difference is a slight trend towards smaller F values, and maybe towards higher T e values, in the frequency distribution of coronae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We compare our T e and F frequency estimates (Fig. 11a) with volcanoes (from the USGS Venus Volcano Catalog; Schaber et al, 1998) and coronae (Stofan et al, 2001) frequency distributions (Fig. 11b and c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14b). Within the western cluster, coronae of type 1 (Stofan et al, 2001) are more evenly distributed throughout its territory, whereas in the eastern cluster they are strongly concentrated within the BAT region (Fig. 14a).…”
Section: The Earlier Global Tectonic Regimementioning
confidence: 95%
“…These structures have been interpreted as linear zones of mantle upwelling and lithospheric extension, in several cases punctuated by single plumes or plume clusters manifest as volcanic rises, shield volcanoes, coronae and radiating graben-fissure systems (e.g. Schaber 1982;Head & Crumpler 1987;Hansen & Phillips 1993;Baer et al 1994;Hamilton & Stofan 1996;Aittola & Kostama 2000;Magee & Head 2001;Stofan et al 2001;Krassilnikov & Head 2003;Harris & Bédard 2014a). On the basis of structural observations and gravitational data, further major extensional rifts have been proposed to follow plains' depressions that were later covered by volcanic materials (Sullivan & Head 1984;Harris & Bédard 2014b).…”
Section: Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronae ( Fig. 5d & e) are annular forms dominated by either positive or negative topography, and which are encircled by concentric systems of fractures and ridges (Type 1 coronae) or by a rim alone (Type 2) Squyres et al 1992;Stofan et al 1992Stofan et al , 2001). Coronae are often associated with radiating, graben -fissure systems ( Fig.…”
Section: Volcanismmentioning
confidence: 99%