2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary analysis of recombinant β-tubulin of Pseudocohnilembus persalinus (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida) as a vaccine antigen candidate against scuticociliatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By immune proteomic screening, tubulin has been determined as one of the candidates for vaccine development against C. irritans ( 19 ). In addition, recombinant β-tubulin has been suggested as a target antigen to control scuticociliatosis, which is caused by parasitic ciliates ( 22 ). I-antigens are surface membrane proteins present on ciliates, and they are considered as the primary vaccine candidates against parasitic ciliates ( 23 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By immune proteomic screening, tubulin has been determined as one of the candidates for vaccine development against C. irritans ( 19 ). In addition, recombinant β-tubulin has been suggested as a target antigen to control scuticociliatosis, which is caused by parasitic ciliates ( 22 ). I-antigens are surface membrane proteins present on ciliates, and they are considered as the primary vaccine candidates against parasitic ciliates ( 23 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the protective immunity induced by I-antigens is serotype specific ( 26 , 27 ), vaccination based on I-antigens may not cover different C. irritans serotypes existing in nature. Tubulin is a well-conserved protein in ciliates, and vaccines using this molecule may solve the problem raised by different serotypes ( 22 ). As expected, grouper immunized with rTt-tubulin showed induced protective immunity, but the protective rate was lower than that of T. thermophila –immunized grouper, which may due to other antigens existing in T. thermophila that may provide immunity stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%