2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary assessment of COSII gene diversity in lulo and a relative species: Initial identification of genes potentially associated with domestication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, dominant RAM markers as well as codominant markers such as SSRs and COSII, conserved in related species as tomato have been used in genetic studies in Physalis (Bonilla et al, 2008; Morillo Paz et al, 2011; Wei et al, 2012). COSII markers represent a strong strategy to integrate diversity estimations over extended genetic distances and to map highly variable gene spots (Bedoya-Reina and Barrero, 2010). Besides, due to the fact they are derived from universal primers transferred among species, these are an economic alternative to other types of co-dominant markers such as SSRs (Enciso-Rodríguez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, dominant RAM markers as well as codominant markers such as SSRs and COSII, conserved in related species as tomato have been used in genetic studies in Physalis (Bonilla et al, 2008; Morillo Paz et al, 2011; Wei et al, 2012). COSII markers represent a strong strategy to integrate diversity estimations over extended genetic distances and to map highly variable gene spots (Bedoya-Reina and Barrero, 2010). Besides, due to the fact they are derived from universal primers transferred among species, these are an economic alternative to other types of co-dominant markers such as SSRs (Enciso-Rodríguez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 327 COSII markers based on their distribution across the 12 linkage groups of the tomato genome, considering their orthologous nature in a broad range of Solanaceae family species (Fulton et al, 2002; Wu et al, 2006; Bedoya-Reina and Barrero, 2010). Furthermore, 33 COSII genes were selected, based on resistance to biotic factors related ontologies (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each read was processed with a variant call pipeline [53] that uses Phred/Phrap/Consed for base calling and assembly [54,55]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%