“…After relevance checking was independently conducted, 10 papers were deemed eligible for inclusion (Figure ). Reasons for exclusion of the other 32 included <90% of the sample aged 18 or below ( n = 13; Armento, ; Armento, McNulty, & Hopko, ; Gawrysiak, Nicholas, & Hopko, ; Harmon, Nelson, & Hayes, ; Levin et al ., ; Ly et al ., ; Mohammadi, Birashk, & Gharaie, ; Moradveisi, Huibers, Renner, Arasteh, & Arntz, ; Parker et al ., ; Proudfoot et al ., ; Shaw, ; Takagaki et al ., ; Velayudhan, Gayatridevi, & Bhattacharjee, ), treatments not meeting the criteria to be regarded as BA ( n = 15; Bilek & Ehrenreich‐May, ; Brent, Kolko, Birmaher, Baugher, & Bridge, ; Brent et al ., , ; Chu, Hoffman, Johns, Reyes‐Portillo, & Hansford, ; Dundon, ; Esposito, ; Ettelson, ; Kauer et al ., ; Landback et al ., ; Merry, McDowell, Wild, Bir, & Cunliffe, ; Nystedt, ; Reid et al ., ; Sobowale et al ., ; Van Voorhees et al ., ), being an ongoing study with currently unreported results ( n = 1; C. E. W. Kitchen, D. Ekers, P. A. Tiffin, & S. Lewis, Personal communication) or examining a sample which had not received a diagnosis of depression at baseline ( n = 3; Davidson et al ., ; Pass, Brisco, & Reynolds, ; Reynolds, Macpherson, Tull, Baruch, & Lejuez, ).…”