2018
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8060202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Data Validation and Reconstruction of Temperature and Precipitation in Central Italy

Abstract: This study provides a unique procedure for validating and reconstructing temperature and precipitation data. Although developed from data in Middle Italy, the validation method is intended to be universal, subject to appropriate calibration according to the climate zones analysed. This research is an attempt to create shared applicative procedures that are most of the time only theorized or included in some software without a clear definition of the methods. The purpose is to detect most types of errors accord… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to Italy, its long tradition in climate observations makes a large number of data series potentially available to the climatology community and final users (Brunetti et al, 2006;Maugeri et al, 2008;Acquaotta et al, 2016). Several papers document the use of such data for climate analysis at the scale of Italian regions, like in Marche (Gentilucci et al, 2018), Emilia-Romagna (Tomozeiu et al, 2006), Calabria (Federico et al, 2010), Sardinia (Chessa et al, 1999), Trentino (Eccel et al, 2012), Piedmont (Acquaotta et al, 2016), along with reports from various regional environmental agencies. At the national level, the use of the synoptic stations from the Italian Air Force National Meteorological Service (henceforth AM) is documented, inter alia, in Toreti and Desiato (2008), who used 49 AM stations to analyse seasonal temperatures from 1961from to 2006from , and in Fioravanti et al (2016, who used stations from AM and two regional networks to assess the temporal and spatial variability of the ETCCDI climate extreme indices (Peterson et al, 2001) for the period 1961-2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to Italy, its long tradition in climate observations makes a large number of data series potentially available to the climatology community and final users (Brunetti et al, 2006;Maugeri et al, 2008;Acquaotta et al, 2016). Several papers document the use of such data for climate analysis at the scale of Italian regions, like in Marche (Gentilucci et al, 2018), Emilia-Romagna (Tomozeiu et al, 2006), Calabria (Federico et al, 2010), Sardinia (Chessa et al, 1999), Trentino (Eccel et al, 2012), Piedmont (Acquaotta et al, 2016), along with reports from various regional environmental agencies. At the national level, the use of the synoptic stations from the Italian Air Force National Meteorological Service (henceforth AM) is documented, inter alia, in Toreti and Desiato (2008), who used 49 AM stations to analyse seasonal temperatures from 1961from to 2006from , and in Fioravanti et al (2016, who used stations from AM and two regional networks to assess the temporal and spatial variability of the ETCCDI climate extreme indices (Peterson et al, 2001) for the period 1961-2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were removed [9]and precipitation measurements greater than 2000 mm were also excluded [8]. The internal consistency check verified the consistency of the data: for example, whether a maximum value was higher than a minimum one, for temperature, and if there were negative values for precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of temporal consistency, the deletion of data is not immediate, but was subject to the spatial consistency. The spatial consistency was performed taking into consideration the neighbouring weather stations, grouped on the basis of their similarity [8]. After validation, climate data were homogenized through the creation of a reference time series for each candidate weather station.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data duration was 28 months, from July 2015 to October 2017. All of the climate data were validated by using quality control procedures [35][36][37].…”
Section: Rain Depth and Other Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%