2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.01.22271763
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary diagnostic performance of the VIDAS® TB-IGRA for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisinfection and disease

Abstract: ImportanceAccurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) infection can be achieved with interferon-γ release assays. Their performance can be improved by utilizing fully automated, single-patient formats.ObjectiveEstablish clinical thresholds for a new interferon-γ release assay, the VIDAS® TB-IGRA, and compare diagnostic performance in detecting tuberculosis infection and disease with the established QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus).DesignPreliminary diagnostic performance study (October 2nd, 2019–February 20th, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of this study is that study participants were recruited from only two countries with high TB-incidence rates, South Africa and Mexico. However, the results obtained in this study are similar to those from a previous study [41] with, notably, 101 patients with TB disease from Burkina Faso (a high TB-incidence country) as well as France and the US, showing that VIDAS ® TB-IGRA had consistently higher sensitivity than QFT-Plus, with fewer indeterminate results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A limitation of this study is that study participants were recruited from only two countries with high TB-incidence rates, South Africa and Mexico. However, the results obtained in this study are similar to those from a previous study [41] with, notably, 101 patients with TB disease from Burkina Faso (a high TB-incidence country) as well as France and the US, showing that VIDAS ® TB-IGRA had consistently higher sensitivity than QFT-Plus, with fewer indeterminate results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%