2020
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Estimate of Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Outbreak — New York City, March 11–May 2, 2020

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
82
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation is that analysis solely of deaths classified as due to COVID-19 do not capture the full excess burden of mortality due to the pandemic. At issue is not only potential misclassification of deaths but also deaths not directly due to SARS-COV-2 infection but nevertheless due to the pandemic, e.g., deaths due to people not seeking care for chest pains because of fear of viral exposure at hospitals [28][29][30]. Wellknown problems affecting counts of NHAIAN deaths and the NHAIAN population likely lead to conservative estimates of risk [18][19][20][21], but misclassification of race/ethnicity on death certificates is very low for the remaining racial/ethnic groups [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is that analysis solely of deaths classified as due to COVID-19 do not capture the full excess burden of mortality due to the pandemic. At issue is not only potential misclassification of deaths but also deaths not directly due to SARS-COV-2 infection but nevertheless due to the pandemic, e.g., deaths due to people not seeking care for chest pains because of fear of viral exposure at hospitals [28][29][30]. Wellknown problems affecting counts of NHAIAN deaths and the NHAIAN population likely lead to conservative estimates of risk [18][19][20][21], but misclassification of race/ethnicity on death certificates is very low for the remaining racial/ethnic groups [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† † † Corresponding author: Lauren M. Rossen, lrossen@cdc.gov. 1 National Center for Health Statistics, CDC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make our inferences, we use both confirm cases and deceased counts. In some regions, sub reporting of COVID-19 related deaths may become relevant, especially in places hit by a severe outbreak [40]. Nonetheless, deaths are a more reliable data source to estimate a COVID-19 outbreak, especially in the forecast of hospital demand.…”
Section: Observational Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%