Preliminary Evaluation of Galileo ACAS Using Existing E1-E6 Open Signals and a Low-Cost SDR Platform

Terris-Gallego, Rafael; López-Salcedo, José A.; Seco-Granados, Gonzalo; Fernandez-Hernandez, Ignacio

doi:10.33012/2023.19319

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, deterministic effects manifest in the target receiver. While intentional spoofing attacks lack documented evidence in aviation, various demonstrations suggest the feasibility of spoofing using contemporary SDRs and GNSS simulators [52][53][54][55]. These demonstrations underscore spoofing as a significant threat to GNSS systems.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Global Navigation Satellite Systems Signal Vulnerabilities in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations: Impact of Affordable Software-Defined Radio

Novák,

Kováčiková,

Kandera

et al. 2024

Drones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spoofing, alongside jamming of the Global Navigation Satellite System signal, remains a significant hazard during general aviation or Unmanned Aerial Vehicle operations. As aircraft utilize various support systems for navigation, such as INS, an insufficient Global Navigation Satellite System signal renders Unmanned Aerial Vehicles nearly uncontrollable, thereby posing increased danger to operations within airspace and to individuals on the ground. This paper primarily focuses on assessing the impact of the budget friendly Software-Defined Radio, HackRF One 1.0, on the safety of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles operations. Considering the widespread use of Software-Defined Radio devices today, with some being reasonably inexpensive, understanding their influence on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles safety is crucial. The generation of artificial interference capable of posing a potential threat in expanding Unmanned Aerial Vehicles airspace is deemed unacceptable.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…with the delay τ I (t) relating to the true delay τ M (t) for the considered satellite m via an offset ∆τ(t) [52]:…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%