2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-005-7157-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Therapeutic Alliance with Clinician (TAC) Questionnaire

Abstract: behavioral health, community, Hispanic, relationship, therapeutic alliance,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Spanish version of the TAC (Bedregal et al, 2006) was evaluated with depressed individuals and achieved high internal consistency ( α = .96). TAC items include “How often are the goals of your work with [therapist] important to you?” Higher scores represent greater alliance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish version of the TAC (Bedregal et al, 2006) was evaluated with depressed individuals and achieved high internal consistency ( α = .96). TAC items include “How often are the goals of your work with [therapist] important to you?” Higher scores represent greater alliance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to limited literacy, three participants requested that the questions be read to them at every session. Potential covariates included demographic information, mean scores of bi-weekly assessments of therapeutic alliance (Bedregal, Paris, Añez, Shahar, & Davidson, 2006)and baseline acculturative stress (Rodriguez et al, 2002) (please see Measures).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish version of the questionnaire (Bedregal, Paris, Jr., Añez, Shahar & Davidson, 2006) was evaluated with a sample predominantly comprised of depressed individuals and achieved high internal consistency ( α = .96). In our sample, internal consistency ranged from α ’s = .87 to .94.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish version of the questionnaire [64] was evaluated with a sample predominantly comprised of depressed individuals and achieved high internal consistency ( α  = 0.96) and an item component correlation of 0.70. The authors concluded that the measure has both clinical and research utility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%