Preliminary Evidence That Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Time to Task Failure of a Sustained Submaximal Contraction

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered while performing a sustained submaximal contraction would increase time to task failure (TTF) compared to sham stimulation. Healthy volunteers (n = 18) performed two fatiguing contractions at 20% of maximum strength with the elbow flexors on separate occasions. During fatigue task performance, either anodal or sham stimulation was delivered to the motor cortex for up to 20 minutes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess changes in cortical excitability during stimulation. There was no systematic effect of the anodal tDCS stimulation on TTF for the entire subject set (n = 18; p = 0.64). Accordingly, a posteriori subjects were divided into two tDCS-time groups: Full-Time (n = 8), where TTF occurred prior to the termination of tDCS, and Part-Time (n = 10), where TTF extended after tDCS terminated. The TTF for the Full-Time group was 31% longer with anodal tDCS compared to sham (p = 0.04), whereas TTF for the Part-Time group did not differ (p = 0.81). Therefore, the remainder of our analysis addressed the Full-Time group. With anodal tDCS, the amount of muscle fatigue was 6% greater at task failure (p = 0.05) and the amount of time the Full-Time group performed the task at an RPE between 8–10 (“very hard”) increased by 38% (p = 0.04) compared to sham. There was no difference in measures of cortical excitability between stimulation conditions (p = 0.90). That the targeted delivery of anodal tDCS during task performance both increased TTF and the amount of muscle fatigue in a subset of subjects suggests that augmenting cortical excitability with tDCS enhanced descending drive to the spinal motorpool to recruit more motor units. The results also suggest that the application of tDCS during performance of fatiguing activity has the potential to bolster the capacity to exercise under conditions required to derive benefits due to overload.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Sucking of a Liquid Bolus in Healthy Humans

“…We cannot infer, on the basis of our results, whether this facilitatory effect was due mainly to the enhancing of motivation and/or descending drive to the motorneuron pool. The finding that anodal tDCS prolonged the contraction time of the suprahyoid/submental muscles agrees with evidence that anodal tDCS may prolong the duration of muscle contraction during a high degree of effort [34,35]. Moreover, it could indicate the involvement of cortical areas responsible for motor planning.…”

Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Muscle Power in Individuals With Advanced Weight-Training Experience?

“…However, 80% of the participants had poorer performance post-stimulation in comparison to baseline on the c-tDCS condition. There have been a few studies that have not found significant effects of motor cortex c-tDCS on strength-related measures (8,45,46). In contrast, there is also evidence suggesting that c-tDCS on the hand motor cortex can induce prolonged excitability decreases, reducing the amplitude of transcranial magnetic stimulation suggested that c-tDCS on the motor cortex can actually induce long-lasting after-effects not only in intracortical networks but also in cortico-motorneuronal axons below the cerebral cortex.…”

Preconditioning tDCS facilitates subsequent tDCS effect on skill acquisition in older adults

“…At neurophysiological level, tDCS placing anode electrode placed over M1 with the current intensity of 1.5 mA increases MEP amplitude in young (Karok and Witney 2013, Tremblay et al 2013a, Williams et al 2013) and older adults (Puri et al 2016, Puri et al 2015.…”