Preliminary Guidelines for Human-Agent Teams in Space Operations Beyond Low-Earth Orbit

Tokadll, Guliz; Dorneich, Michael C.; Gonzalez-Torres, Tomas

doi:10.1109/dasc.2018.8569523

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The interaction paradigm and associated interface were developed based on the requirements defined for HAT in space operations, domain knowledge models for HAT, and preliminary function allocation guidelines for HAT (Tokadlı, Dorneich et al, 2018; Tokadlı & Dorneich, 2017). Based on shared task model, the human and CA teammates exchanged information regarding the desired goals, tasks, partial plans, and constraints in the developing environmental conditions (Figure 1) (Tokadlı et al, 2021).…”

Section: Cognitive Assistant Prototype Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Functional decomposition, task labels, and delegation components (human and autonomous teammates) were identified based on the previous phases of this study (Tokadlı, Dorneich et al, 2018; Tokadlı & Dorneich, 2017). A “play” can be based on a checklist or a procedure and is represented as a hierarchical functional decomposition (Tokadlı et al, 2021).…”

Section: Cognitive Assistant Prototype Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Autonomy as a Teammate: Evaluation of Teammate-Likeness

Tokadli

Dorneich

2022

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What makes an autonomous system a teammate? The paper presents an evaluation of factors that can encourage a human perceive an autonomous system as a teammate rather than a tool. Increased perception of teammate-likeness more closely matches the human’s expectations of a teammate’s behavior, benefiting coordination and cooperation. Previous work with commercial pilots suggested that autonomous systems should provide visible cues of actions situated in the work environment. These results motivated the present study to investigate the impact of feedback modality on the teammate-likeness of an autonomous system under low (sequential events) and high (concurrent events) task loads. A Cognitive Assistant (CA) was developed as an autonomous teammate to support a (simulated) Mars mission. With centralized feedback, an autonomous teammate provided verbal and written information on a dedicated display. With distributed feedback, the autonomous teammate provided visible cues of actions in the environment in addition to centralized feedback. Perception of teammate-likeness increased with distributed feedback due to increased awareness of the CA’s actions, especially under low task load. In high task load, teamwork performance was higher with distributed feedback when compared to centralized feedback, where in low task load there was no difference in teamwork performance between feedback modalities.

show abstract

Section: Cognitive Assistant Prototype Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%