2013
DOI: 10.4236/ijohns.2013.25041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Hearing Results of Tympanomastoidectomies Using Titanium Prostheses: Scenario in a Developing Country

Abstract: The study was done to review postoperative hearing gain of patients with different Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) undergoing Tympanomastoidectomies with titanium prostheses reconstruction. A Retrospective chart review was performed from September 2009 to December 2011. Of the 17 cases, 9 had moderate MERI while 8 had severe MERI. 9 patients underwent Tympanomastoidectomy with Total Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses (TORP) and 8 with Partial Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses (PORP). Hearing gain of 25.31 dB w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On applying the one way ANOVA the p-value was (P=0.01). This observation was in concurrence with the finding of Gulati A, et al [26] and not in concurrence with findings of Khalid A, et al [27]. Further post hoc Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test was applied to find the difference between mild, moderate and severe MERI groups.…”
Section: Middle Ear Risk Indexsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On applying the one way ANOVA the p-value was (P=0.01). This observation was in concurrence with the finding of Gulati A, et al [26] and not in concurrence with findings of Khalid A, et al [27]. Further post hoc Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test was applied to find the difference between mild, moderate and severe MERI groups.…”
Section: Middle Ear Risk Indexsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study the p-value for mean audiological gain in the group of the patients with mild, moderate and severe MERI at 6 months after surgery on applying the one way ANOVA was (P=0.02), the difference being statistically significant. This observation was in concurrence with the finding of Gulati A, et al [26] and not in concurrence with findings of Khalid A, et al [27]. Post hoc Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test was applied to find the difference between mild, moderate and severe MERI groups.…”
Section: Middle Ear Risk Indexsupporting
confidence: 83%