2005
DOI: 10.1600/0363644054782198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Investigation of the Systematics of <I>Didymodon</I> (Pottiaceae, Musci) Based on nrITS Sequence Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus on key characters with a low phylogenetic component and high transition rates may explain why moss taxonomy, wherein (morpho)species polyphyly is the rule rather than the exception (Shaw, 2000;Shaw and Allen, 2000;Stech and Dohrmann, 2004;Stech and Wagner, 2005;Werner et al, 2005aWerner et al, , 2005b, is particularly unstable and vulnerable to phylogenetic testing (see Goffinet and Buck [20041 for a review). Ranker et al (2004) similarly found that the characters that have been traditionally used for taxonomy in grammitid ferns are among the most homoplastic, whereas other, potentially informative features have been regarded as having no taxonomic value or have been ignored.…”
Section: Consequences For Morphological Evolution In Brachytheciastrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on key characters with a low phylogenetic component and high transition rates may explain why moss taxonomy, wherein (morpho)species polyphyly is the rule rather than the exception (Shaw, 2000;Shaw and Allen, 2000;Stech and Dohrmann, 2004;Stech and Wagner, 2005;Werner et al, 2005aWerner et al, , 2005b, is particularly unstable and vulnerable to phylogenetic testing (see Goffinet and Buck [20041 for a review). Ranker et al (2004) similarly found that the characters that have been traditionally used for taxonomy in grammitid ferns are among the most homoplastic, whereas other, potentially informative features have been regarded as having no taxonomic value or have been ignored.…”
Section: Consequences For Morphological Evolution In Brachytheciastrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…177. A molecular study byWerner et al (2005a) shows that previous sectional divisions of Didymodon cannot be maintained, but does not yet provide enough detail to demarcate new sections. 178.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 species accepted worldwide (Zander 1993;2007); six have now been recorded in New Zealand. Werner et al (2005) interpreted their molecular data as supporting the monophyly of the genus, contrary to the conclusion of Zander (1993) that the genus "is clearly heterogeneous", a conclusion in part based on its being "suspiciously heterogeneous in KOH colour reactions". This latter character thus becomes a useful identification tool at species level within Didymodon; it allows separation of D. novae-zelandiae (yellow) from two of its New Zealand congeners, namely D. torquatus (Taylor 1846: 50) Catcheside (1980 and D. weymouthii (both orange).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%