1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981201)83:11<2270::aid-cncr6>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary report of the asian-oceanian clinical oncology association randomized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
55
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geara et al 5 further stated that the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's singleinstitution, nonrandomized study showing the beneficial effects of chemotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma "could be considered confirmatory of these two recent trials." However, in this issue of Cancer, Chua et al, 6 citing the same VUMCA trial, noted that "No survival benefit could be demonstrated with the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the current study and in the International Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group trial" and concluded that "routine administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this target group is not recommended." As such, the same study lends itself to different interpretations for either the advocates or the opponents of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Geara et al 5 further stated that the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's singleinstitution, nonrandomized study showing the beneficial effects of chemotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma "could be considered confirmatory of these two recent trials." However, in this issue of Cancer, Chua et al, 6 citing the same VUMCA trial, noted that "No survival benefit could be demonstrated with the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the current study and in the International Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group trial" and concluded that "routine administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this target group is not recommended." As such, the same study lends itself to different interpretations for either the advocates or the opponents of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In this issue of Cancer, Chua et al 6 report the preliminary results of the Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association's randomized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The authors reported no significant gain in relapse free and overall survival with the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concluded that they could not recommend the routine administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for this group of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nach Abschluss einer Phase-II-Studie zur neoadjuvanten Chemotherapie mit Cisplatin und Epirubicin begann die Asian-Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association eine prospektiv randomisierte multizentrische Phase-III-Studie [14]. Von September 1989 bis August 1993 wurden 334 Patienten mit undifferenziertem oder schlecht differenziertem Nasopharynxkarzinom im Stadium III/IV nach Ho rekrutiert.…”
Section: Neoadjuvante Chemotherapieunclassified
“…Traditionally, based on the anatomic location and the high radiosensitivity, the NPC is treated by radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy [1,9,11,20]. About 80% of the patients show cervical lymph node involvement at first presentation [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%