2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary reservoir model of enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) in a subbituminous coal seam, Huntly Coalfield, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these possible reservoirs, unmineable coal seams have a particular advantage, since in the process of injection, CO 2 displaces methane that can be produced as a by‐product in CO 2 sequestration technology. This scenario, also known as enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery [ Mazzotti et al , 2009], is considered the most favorable because of its economic incentives [ Zarrouk and Moore , 2009]. ECBM recovery utilizes the preferential adsorption capacity of coal for carbon dioxide over methane [ Busch et al , 2006; Esteves et al , 2008; Kurniawan et al , 2006; Majewska and Ziętek , 2008; Ottiger et al , 2008a], and it has been tested in a number of field projects [ Reeves , 2004; van Bergen et al , 2009b; Wong et al , 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among these possible reservoirs, unmineable coal seams have a particular advantage, since in the process of injection, CO 2 displaces methane that can be produced as a by‐product in CO 2 sequestration technology. This scenario, also known as enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery [ Mazzotti et al , 2009], is considered the most favorable because of its economic incentives [ Zarrouk and Moore , 2009]. ECBM recovery utilizes the preferential adsorption capacity of coal for carbon dioxide over methane [ Busch et al , 2006; Esteves et al , 2008; Kurniawan et al , 2006; Majewska and Ziętek , 2008; Ottiger et al , 2008a], and it has been tested in a number of field projects [ Reeves , 2004; van Bergen et al , 2009b; Wong et al , 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential storage capacity of carbon dioxide in coal is well documented in the literature [ Bae and Bhatia , 2006; Day et al , 2008b, 2008c; Fitzgerald et al , 2003; Gürdal and Yalçın , 2000; Gruszkiewicz et al , 2009; He et al , 2010; Krooss et al , 2002; Kurniawan et al , 2006; Liu and Smirnov , 2008, 2009; Mares et al , 2009; Mastalerz et al , 2004, 2008; Milewska ‐ Duda et al , 2000; Mohammad et al , 2009; Ottiger et al , 2006, 2008a; Radovic et al , 1997; Sakurovs et al , 2007; 2008; Sınayuç and Gümrah , 2009; Yao et al , 2009; Zarrouk and Moore , 2009]. Numerous experimental techniques, such as the gravimetric‐chromatographic method [ Ottiger et al , 2006, 2008a], the gravimetric sorption method [ Bae and Bhatia , 2006; Day et al , 2008b; Sakurovs et al , 2008], the isothermal adsorption method [ Mastalerz et al , 2008; Yao et al , 2009], the small‐angle neutron scattering method [ He et al , 2010; Mares et al , 2009], and the volumetric method [ Gürdal and Yalçın , 2000; Gruszkiewicz et al , 2009; Krooss et al , 2002; Mastalerz et al , 2004; Radovic et al , 1997], were adopted to investigate CO 2 adsorption capacity of coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saghafi [5] investigated the CO 2 -ECBM potential in the Australian coalbeds. Similar studies were conducted for CO 2 storage in potential coal beds located in various countries [6][7][8][9][10]. Busch and Gensterblum [11] presented a review article on CO 2 -ECBM process and focused mainly on the adsorption mechanisms involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Simulation Tool. TOUGH2 is widely used to simulate nonisothermal multiphase and multicomponent flow for CO 2 geological sequestration (e.g., [12,25,26] 3.2. Geometry, Grid Discretization, and Parameters.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%