“…Numerous experimental techniques, such as the gravimetric‐chromatographic method [ Ottiger et al , 2006, 2008a], the gravimetric sorption method [ Bae and Bhatia , 2006; Day et al , 2008b; Sakurovs et al , 2008], the isothermal adsorption method [ Mastalerz et al , 2008; Yao et al , 2009], the small‐angle neutron scattering method [ He et al , 2010; Mares et al , 2009], and the volumetric method [ Gürdal and Yalçın , 2000; Gruszkiewicz et al , 2009; Krooss et al , 2002; Mastalerz et al , 2004; Radovic et al , 1997], were adopted to investigate CO 2 adsorption capacity of coal. In addition, various theoretical methods were employed, including reservoir simulations (e.g., ECBM‐TOUGH2) [ Zarrouk and Moore , 2009], the Toth equation [ Bae and Bhatia , 2006], the lattice density functional theory (DFT) model [ Ottiger et al , 2008a], the Denton‐Ashcroft DFT model [ Kurniawan et al , 2006], Monte Carlo (MC) simulation [ Kurniawan et al , 2006; Sınayuç and Gümrah , 2009], the modified Dubinin‐Radushkevich (DR) model [ Day et al , 2008b, 2008c; He et al , 2010; Sakurovs et al , 2007; 2008], the simplified local‐density Peng‐Robinson (SLD‐PR) model [ Fitzgerald et al , 2003; Mohammad et al , 2009], the multiple sorption model (MSM) [ Milewska ‐ Duda et al , 2000], and variable saturation models [ Liu and Smirnov , 2008; 2009]. CO 2 adsorption capacity is influenced by many factors, such as porosity, lithotype, rank, and water content [ Zarrouk and Moore , 2009].…”