2015
DOI: 10.1051/proc/201552006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary results for the study of the godunov scheme applied to the linear wave equation with porosity at low mach number

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce continuous tools to study the low Mach number behavior of the Godunov scheme applied to the linear wave equation with porosity on cartesian meshes. More precisely, we extend the Hodge decomposition to a weighted L 2 space in the continuous case and we study the properties of the modified equation associated to this Godunov scheme. This allows to partly explain the inaccuracy of the Godunov scheme at low Mach number on cartesian meshes and to propose two corrections: a first one named low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that when close to the limit, the accuracy of theses schemes is not sufficient to describe the flow. Many efforts have been done in the recent past in order to correct this main drawback of Godunov schemes, for instance by using preconditioning methods [34] or by splitting and correcting the pressure on the collocated meshes [5], [9,10], [12], [13,14,30], [15], [23,24], [26,27,28], or instead by using staggered grids like in the famous MAC scheme, see for instance [3], [16], [17], [18], [19], [31]. Unfortunately, even if these approaches permit to bypass the consistency problem of Godunov methods, they all need to resolve the scale of the acoustic waves in the fluid in order to remain stable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that when close to the limit, the accuracy of theses schemes is not sufficient to describe the flow. Many efforts have been done in the recent past in order to correct this main drawback of Godunov schemes, for instance by using preconditioning methods [34] or by splitting and correcting the pressure on the collocated meshes [5], [9,10], [12], [13,14,30], [15], [23,24], [26,27,28], or instead by using staggered grids like in the famous MAC scheme, see for instance [3], [16], [17], [18], [19], [31]. Unfortunately, even if these approaches permit to bypass the consistency problem of Godunov methods, they all need to resolve the scale of the acoustic waves in the fluid in order to remain stable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also remarked that the accuracy of the Godunov scheme at low Mach number on Cartesian meshes can be recovered by deleting the diffusion term on the velocity field in the Godunov scheme. In [14] we discussed the case with porosity with the help of the modified equation approach; the limitations of this approach is that it only gives hints (but does not provide with a complete proof) on what happens on Cartesian meshes, and does not apply to triangular meshes. Our aim here is to analyse the behavior of the schemes on triangular and rectangular Cartesian meshes by directly studying them rather than their modified equations.…”
Section: The Low Mach Asymptoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-discrete Godunov scheme applied to the resolution of the linear wave equation is obtained by integrating (10) over each cell Ω i and then solving a Riemann problem on each Γ ij to express interface fluxes as functions of cell-centered values. Details are provided in [14]. This results in…”
Section: Godunov Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis [40,41,56,2,44,1] and the development of numerical methods [37,33,54,62,42,13,31,51,47,34,30,50,48,16,19,17,15,32,10,28,39,20,11,21] for the passage from compressible to incompressible gas dynamics has been and is still a very active field of research. The compressible Euler equations which describe conservation of density, momentum and energy in a fluid flow become stiff when the Mach number tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%