1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001289900535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Results of a Survey of Lead Levels in Human Liver Tissue

Abstract: Lead and compounds containing lead are widespread throughout the environment. Aside from specific instances of occupational exposure (for example, workers in smelters, radiator repair shops, battery manufacturing plants), there are several routes by which the general population is exposed to lead. Humans are exposed to trace quantities of lead on a daily basis through inhalation of air, consumption of drinking water, and inigestion of food. Children, who tend to have increased hand-to-mouth activity, ingest la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative distribution of lead in soft tissues, in both males and females, expressed in terms of liver tissue concentration ratios, was: liver, 1.0 (approximately 1 µg/g wet weight); kidney cortex, 0.8; kidney medulla, 0.5; pancreas, 0.4; ovary, 0.4; spleen, 0.3; prostate, 0.2; adrenal gland, 0.2; brain, 0.1; fat, 0.1; testis, 0.08; heart, 0.07; and skeletal muscle, 0.05 (Barry, 1975;Gross et al, 1975). In contrast to lead in bone, which accumulates lead with continued exposure in adulthood, concentrations in soft tissues (e.g., liver and kidney) are relatively constant in adults (Barry, 1975;Treble and Thompson, 1997), reflecting faster turnover of lead in these tissues.…”
Section: Figure 14: Schematic Presentation Of Lead Distribution In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative distribution of lead in soft tissues, in both males and females, expressed in terms of liver tissue concentration ratios, was: liver, 1.0 (approximately 1 µg/g wet weight); kidney cortex, 0.8; kidney medulla, 0.5; pancreas, 0.4; ovary, 0.4; spleen, 0.3; prostate, 0.2; adrenal gland, 0.2; brain, 0.1; fat, 0.1; testis, 0.08; heart, 0.07; and skeletal muscle, 0.05 (Barry, 1975;Gross et al, 1975). In contrast to lead in bone, which accumulates lead with continued exposure in adulthood, concentrations in soft tissues (e.g., liver and kidney) are relatively constant in adults (Barry, 1975;Treble and Thompson, 1997), reflecting faster turnover of lead in these tissues.…”
Section: Figure 14: Schematic Presentation Of Lead Distribution In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative distribution of lead in soft tissues, in males and females, expressed in terms of tissue:liver concentration ratios, were: liver, 1.0 (approximately 1 μg/g wet weight); kidney cortex, 0.8; kidney medulla, 0.5; pancreas, 0.4; ovary, 0.4; spleen, 0.3; (Barry 1975;Gross et al 1975). In contrast to lead in bone, which accumulates lead with continued exposure in adulthood, concentrations in soft tissues (e.g., liver and kidney) are relatively constant in adults (Barry 1975;Treble and Thompson 1997), reflecting a faster turnover of lead in soft tissue, relative to bone.…”
Section: Lead In Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…expressed in terms of tissue:liver concentration ratios, were: liver, 1.0 (approximately 1 μg/g wet weight); kidney cortex, 0.8; kidney medulla, 0.5; pancreas, 0.4; ovary, 0.4; spleen, 0.3; prostate, 0.2; adrenal gland, 0.2; brain, 0.1; fat, 0.1; testis, 0.08; heart, 0.07; and skeletal muscle, 0.05 (Barry 1975;Gross et al 1975). In contrast to Pb in bone, which accumulates Pb with continued exposure in adulthood, concentrations in soft tissues (e.g., liver and kidney) are relatively constant in adults (Barry 1975;Treble and Thompson 1997), reflecting a faster turnover of Pb in soft tissue, relative to bone.…”
Section: Toxicokinetics Susceptible Populations Biomarkers Chemical Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%