“…Furthermore, compounds 4a – 8a are more cytotoxic than several conjugates reported in the literature such as platinum complexes of enantiomerically pure α‐trifluoromethyl alanine , 1,4‐bis(2‐aminoethylamino)anthraquinone–, ametantrone–, and mitoxantrone–amino acid conjugates and more than naphthalimide–leucine conjugates against A‐549 and/or MCF‐7 cells. - In the group of purine–naphthohydroquinone conjugates 10 – 13 , the fully aromatized compounds 10a – 13a (GI 50 2.9–8.7 μM) also showed higher cytotoxicity than the corresponding 5,8‐dihydro‐ ( 10b – 13b ) or 5,6,7,8‐tetrahydro‐ ( 10c – 13c ) derivatives against A‐549 or HT‐29 cultured cells. Their GI 50 values were in the same range or better than those observed for hybrid naphthohydroquinone–nucleic base mimics previously reported by us , also than 6,5′‐bis‐ureidoadenosine derivatives , purine derivatives of allofuranose , benzoxazepin‐purine derivatives , and bis‐ N 9 ‐(methyl‐phenylmethyl)purine derivatives . Furthermore, among those evaluated compounds, one of the most active against the three cell lines assayed is the guanine–naphthohydroquinone hybrid 13a , with a GI 50 value of 3.0–3.1 μM, showing for the MCF‐7 cell line the same cytotoxicity as observed with the standard drug doxorubicin.
…”