1895
DOI: 10.4039/ent2719-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Studies in Siphonaptera—i

Abstract: A. s15i,os,s,I examined r6 specimens, all of rvhich agree with eaclr other in every particular, rvhile ,4, ,uoartrdi shorvs distinct. and marked differences.,, (Oct. 29, rg94 ) rt rvill be seen from the above, that rhe credit of differentiating this uew species is very largely due to x'Ir. pergande. Altriough this beginning of our information corcerni'g it is very i'adeqnate, there wiri, I trusr, be no furtber difhculty about its separation from its congeners, thanks to Mr' Pergande's excellent conrparati'e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The species groups in the genus Thrassis were fraught with confusion until Stark (1970) provided a detailed revision that included 29 species (including subspecies), the best account of geographical distribution of all species in the genus. Lewis (1974b) considered Thrassis as a valid genus, while Smit (1983) relagated Thrassis to a subgenus of Oropsylla . Lewis (1990) again validated Thrassis as a genus, including 29 valid species.…”
Section: Results Systematic Entomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The species groups in the genus Thrassis were fraught with confusion until Stark (1970) provided a detailed revision that included 29 species (including subspecies), the best account of geographical distribution of all species in the genus. Lewis (1974b) considered Thrassis as a valid genus, while Smit (1983) relagated Thrassis to a subgenus of Oropsylla . Lewis (1990) again validated Thrassis as a genus, including 29 valid species.…”
Section: Results Systematic Entomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhynchopsyllus pulex Haller 1880:82, Taschenberg 1880:57–62, Baker 1895a:3 (none), Fuller 1942b:44 (Colombia), Augustson and Ryan 1948:111–112, Eads and Menzies 1949b:38, Eads 1950a:74 (TX), Capri and Capri 1953:582 (Argentina), Barrera and Diaz-Ungria 1957:174–175 (Venezuela), Johnson 1957:237–238 (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela), Machado-Allison 1963:271–272, 275 (Venezuela), Tamsitt and I. Fox 1970:1093 (Colombia), Sakaguti 1972:plate I (none), Tipton and Machado-Allison 1972:4–5 (Venezuela), Mendez 1977:164–165 (Colombia), Cheetham 1988:108 (none), Beaucournu and Gallardo 1992:116 (Chile), Beaucournu et al 1998:1011 (none), Autino et al 1999:155–157, 159 (Argentina), Alarcón 2000:16 (Chile), Autino and Claps 2000:199–200 (none), Esbérard 2001:1169–1170 (Brizil)…”
Section: Results Systematic Entomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the latter half of the last century, P. irritans, also known as the ''human flea,'' was the only commonly reported pulicid flea on a variety of wild carnivores, including foxes and coyotes (Canis latrans) in the western United States (Hubbard, 1968). Then, Smit (1958) resurrected Pulex simulans, a species originally described by Baker (1895). This flea appeared to be a more zoophilic species distinct from, but closely related to, P. irritans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%