2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-012-2088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary studies into profiling DNA recovered from a radiation or radioactivity incident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This result is unusual and not demonstrated by prior studies exploring similar effects [17,18,[38][39][40]42]. It is unlikely that inherent template damage or cellular function is responsible for these observations, since the doses applied are beyond those expected to initiate any adaptive DNA repair response [45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). This result is unusual and not demonstrated by prior studies exploring similar effects [17,18,[38][39][40]42]. It is unlikely that inherent template damage or cellular function is responsible for these observations, since the doses applied are beyond those expected to initiate any adaptive DNA repair response [45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These lesions can prevent strand uncoiling, alter primer binding sites, and/or block DNA polymerase during PCR [14,15]. This results in allelic dropout, particularly for longer amplicons that incur DNA damage lesions with greater frequency [16], following sufficiently high doses (> 10 kGy) of γ-radiation [17,18]. multiplexed STRs is unrivalled by HVR sequencing [23,24].…”
Section: Foot Note Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For material contaminated with radionuclides, a critical consideration is whether exposure to radiation will in fact diminish the value of forensic evidence. Research has been undertaken, and continues to occur, to quantitatively explore the effects of ionizing radiation in a range of forensic evidence types including DNA, fingerprints, , electronic devices, and fibers . Generally, this research suggests that these evidence types may retain forensic value in spite of exposure to ionizing radiation and thus should be examined as part of the nuclear forensics process.…”
Section: Traditional Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 99%