2018
DOI: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2018/6.3.135.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Study of Seroprevalence of Chlamydophila Abortus Amongst Cattle in Ninavah Province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All positive samples were from cattle age group above three years. This finding was in contrast with the finding of Majed et al, (2018), where seroprevalence was 1.47% among calves. Feeding colostrum to neonates can boost immunity (Yang et al, 2015) and there is such practice in Nepal.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All positive samples were from cattle age group above three years. This finding was in contrast with the finding of Majed et al, (2018), where seroprevalence was 1.47% among calves. Feeding colostrum to neonates can boost immunity (Yang et al, 2015) and there is such practice in Nepal.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…2.17% (total sample=92) in Nawalpur and Chitwan District. Seroprevalence of Chlamydia abortus in ruminants varies widely from one country to another, 0.82% in Iraq (Majed et al, 2018), 4.75% in Ireland (Wilson et al, 2012) and 4.65% in five states of India (Chahota et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…apresentem baixa especificidade ao hospedeiro, os búfalos e bovinos possuem características semelhantes, fazendo com que o agente também possa estar relacionado a distúrbios reprodutivos na espécie bubalina [15]. m bovinos baixas prevalências foram relatadas na Costa Rica com 0,10% [33], no Iraque com 0,82% [18], no Brasil com 1,42% [36] e na Argentina com 4,78% [31] em comparação às prevalências encontradas em bubalinos que foram de 11,67% [2] e 78,43% [25] no Egito e 57% [15] na Itália. Mesmo não sendo identificados os fatores de risco, o manejo semi-intensivo a extensivo que ocorre em propriedades com búfalos poderia explicar a frequência de anticorpos, já que o contato entre animais criados a pasto pode favorecer a infecção por via oral [26,39].…”
Section: Resultsunclassified