2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4306-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats

Abstract: Rationale Disorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues. Objectives To determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have addressed the role of sex differences in incentive salience attribution. The presence of sex-related differences in conditioned approach behavior is in line with other studies where female rats acquired ST behavior slightly faster than males [ 47 , 54 ] or presented higher ST behavior than males sustained in time [ 55 ]. However, sex differences in ST and GT behavior may be strain-dependent since they have not been detected in all studies [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies have addressed the role of sex differences in incentive salience attribution. The presence of sex-related differences in conditioned approach behavior is in line with other studies where female rats acquired ST behavior slightly faster than males [ 47 , 54 ] or presented higher ST behavior than males sustained in time [ 55 ]. However, sex differences in ST and GT behavior may be strain-dependent since they have not been detected in all studies [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This task assesses sensitivity to cues in the environment, by measuring the ability of those cues to elicit approach behavior (Meyer et al , 2012a, Robinson et al , 2014). Response to Pavlovian reward cues have been further associated with response to drug-cues (Saunders & Robinson, 2010, Versaggi et al , 2016) and action impulsivity (King et al , 2016, Lovic et al , 2011). Response to environmental cues may explain one mechanism by which drug-associated stimuli come to prompt maladaptive behavior or drug seeking (Childress et al , 2008, Franklin et al , 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, therefore, may entail a high attrition rate, a spatial bias toward certain signals, and/or a protracted training process (Puumala et al, 1996;Passetti et al, 2002;Bari et al, 2008), which could introduce certain confounding factors, such as age, learning effects, and "enrichment" resulting from training. Another well-documented, less complex yet multifunctional task is the 2-choice reaction time (2-CRT) task, which has been used to assess deficits in sustained attention (McGaughy and Sarter, 1995), motor readiness (Brown and Robbins, 1991), and response inhibition (Phillips and Brown, 1999;King et al, 2016), as well as overall attention deficits (Hausknecht et al, 2005). In the present study, a modified 2-CRT task was applied, which involved a short training process and thus could demonstrate possible attention deficits in young rats after PE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%