A computer model of "modulated sinus parasystole" was devised in which two sinus pacemakers interacted electrotonically, entraining each other's periodicity according to their beat-tobeat phasic relationships. Depending on the preestablished rules, the model gave rise to various rhythm patterns that were similar to those recorded in patients with sinoatrial arrhythmias. The validity of the model in predicting clinically observed rhythm disturbances was tested in a case of sinoatrial extrasystolic activity. The sinoatrial origin of parasystolic discharges giving rise to various patterns of group beating in this case was diagnosed according to the following electrocardiographic criteria: (1) premature P waves having contour identical to P waves of basic beats, (2) variable coupling intervals, and (3) absence of compensatory pauses (i.e., returning cycles having duration similar to that of the basic P-P interval). For the analysis, it was assumed that two distinct but closely apposed sinoatrial pacemaker centers were competing for activation of the heart. The model accurately simulated the arrhythmias in the electrocardiographic trace. The best fit was found when the two pacemakers interacted on the basis of "resetting" in one direction and electrotonic modulation in the other. In fact, under appropriate conditions, the model matched precisely all frequency-dependent patterns of extrasystolic activity observed in the trace. We conclude that the modulated parasystole hypothesis can readily explain the mechanism of sinus extrasystolic discharges whose returning cycle equals the basic P-P interval. Moreover, the model predicts that, when the rules for mutual entrainment between "dominant" and parasystolic sinus pacemaker are appropriate, the retuming cycle can be shorter than the basic cycle. Circulation 74, No. 5, 945-954, 1986. In 1908, Wenckebach' first suggested that extrasystoles could arise from the sinoatrial region. In the electrocardiogram, such extrasystoles are characterized by premature P waves whose contour is identical to that of P waves associated with normal pacemaker activity, and by the absence of compensatory pauses. After the initial description, only a handful of clinical examples had been published,1 7 until 1967 when Schamroth' published the first case attributed to sinus parasystole. In that case, the ectopic atrial beats differed in contour from the sinus beats, and probably originated outside of the sinoatrial region. Yet the dominant sinoatrial pacemaker showed complete entrance block and, for that reason, the arrhythmia was termed "sinus parasystole."5 The case analyzed here is the first clinical ex-