2011
DOI: 10.5650/jos.60.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premicelle Formation of Double-chain Surfactants and Bile Salts in the Neighborhood of the CMC Region: Application of a Differential Conductivity Technique to the Determination of Micellization Parameters

Abstract: It has been demonstrated that differential conductivity, dκ/dC, is useful for experimentally extracting the contribution of micellar aggregates from the conductivity data of an ionic surfactant solution in which aggregates and monomers coexist. This extraction allows us to treat the micellization process using a simple two-state model (nS→M) instead of the general mass action model of micellization (nS+qG→M). As a result, the three parameters of micellization, i.e., aggregation number (n), micellization consta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2C 12 (2/2) showed a higher CMC value than gemini surfactants with cyclic spacer of benzene rings. The α of 2C 12 (2/2) obtained from the conductivity was close to 1, indicating that the surfactant formed loose micelles in solution . This result obtained for 2C 12 (2/2) was supported by the free energy of micellization |Δ G mic °|, which was smaller than those of monomeric and other gemini surfactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2C 12 (2/2) showed a higher CMC value than gemini surfactants with cyclic spacer of benzene rings. The α of 2C 12 (2/2) obtained from the conductivity was close to 1, indicating that the surfactant formed loose micelles in solution . This result obtained for 2C 12 (2/2) was supported by the free energy of micellization |Δ G mic °|, which was smaller than those of monomeric and other gemini surfactants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The α of 2C 12 (2/2) obtained from the conductivity was close to 1, indicating that the surfactant formed loose micelles in solution. 40 This result obtained for 2C 12 (2/2) was supported by the free energy of micellization |ΔG mic °|, which was smaller than those of monomeric and other gemini surfactants. 2 C 1 2 ( 2 / 2 -N -2 ) w i t h t h e 1 -m e t h y l -4 -[ 2 -( N , Ndimethylammonio)ethyl]piperazin-1-ium spacer showed smaller α and larger |ΔG mic °| values than 2C 12 (2/2).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%