1990
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(90)90096-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 III. THE PREDICTION ALGORITHM Our method of forecasting resembles the algorithm M8 introduced by Keilis-Borok et al, 6 which is currently being studied as a possible means of using worldwide seismic data sets to predict the largest earthquakes in any given region. The M8 algorithm is based on the hypothesis that regional small scale seismicity may be used to diagnose an 7 upcoming large event.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 III. THE PREDICTION ALGORITHM Our method of forecasting resembles the algorithm M8 introduced by Keilis-Borok et al, 6 which is currently being studied as a possible means of using worldwide seismic data sets to predict the largest earthquakes in any given region. The M8 algorithm is based on the hypothesis that regional small scale seismicity may be used to diagnose an 7 upcoming large event.…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of studies show that patterns of occurrence of small and moderate earthquakes may bring relevant information on the location and time of occurrence of future major earthquakes (Keilis-Borok and Kossobokov, 1990;Jackson and Kagan, 1999;Kossobokov et al, 1999;Kagan and Jackson, 2000;Evison, 2004, 2005;Tiampo et al, 2008). Amongst the different proposed methods, the CN algorithm (Keilis-Borok and ) is considered in this study, since it is fully formalized and has been already submitted to a rigorous validation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there exist the prediction algorithms which efficiently forecast strong earthquakes in advance (Kossobokov and Shebalin, 2003). The foreshock activity of middle-size earthquakes underlies these algorithms (Keilis-Borok, 2003). On the other hand, some scientists argue that these algorithms hardly reflect the physics of the seismicity and that the efficiency of the current outcome of the prediction will decline later (Geller et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructed model remains predictable but the growth of activity underlies the prediction of strong events. The prediction algorithm corresponds to that for real seismicity (Keilis-Borok, 2003). The highest efficiency of prediction is attained when the system comes to the subcritical state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%