2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premorbid adjustment, symptom development and quality of life in first episode psychosis: a systematic review and critical reappraisal

Abstract: Premorbid adjustment remains a valid construct in the study of FEP. Both premorbid adjustment and DUP confer independent effects on aspects of symptomatology in FEP. Results for premorbid adjustment are similar to previous findings in more chronic samples. The potential for conceptualizing premorbid functioning by developmental, academic/social and typological approaches is currently underexploited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
70
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(228 reference statements)
10
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Childhood conduct disorder, the precursor to adult ASPD, may be a behavior pattern that contributes to impaired premorbid adjustment in areas such as academic and social functioning, which subsequently impacts on symptom severity (Macbeth & Gumley, 2008). This suggests that clients with ASPD and co-occurring disorders are an especially disadvantaged group due to the toxic conjunction of substance use problems, SMI, and illness severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Childhood conduct disorder, the precursor to adult ASPD, may be a behavior pattern that contributes to impaired premorbid adjustment in areas such as academic and social functioning, which subsequently impacts on symptom severity (Macbeth & Gumley, 2008). This suggests that clients with ASPD and co-occurring disorders are an especially disadvantaged group due to the toxic conjunction of substance use problems, SMI, and illness severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it appears timely to assess prospectively whether premorbid functioning is informative regarding risk of psychosis conversion (MacBeth & Gumley, 2008). To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study of premorbid functional development and prediction of psychosis in CHR individuals.…”
Section: Functioning In Clinical High-risk (Chr) Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of first- and multiple-episode psychotic disorders emphasize the prognostic importance of functioning prior to psychosis onset (Haas, & Sweeney, 1992; MacBeth, & Gumley, 2008). “Stable-poor” and “deteriorating” patterns of functioning are associated with earlier age of onset, greater severity and poorer treatment responsiveness of negative symptoms, worse social functioning, greater poverty of movement, greater deficits in verbal fluency and verbal memory, and poorer quality of life (e.g., Addington & Addington, 2005; Haas & Sweeney, 1992; Strous et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop better and more specific treatments researchers and clinicians focus on identifying factors associated with long-term disability that can be assessed already at the initial treatment contact (Kirkpatrick et al, 2006). Studies of patients coming into treatment for their first episode of psychosis show that severity of psychotic symptoms at first treatment contact as well as diagnosis has a relatively weak association with poor psychosocial functioning (from now called “functioning”) and is a poor predictor of future disability, while negative symptoms (Pogue-Geile and Harrow, 1985; White et al, 2009), male gender (Cotton et al, 2009), poor premorbid adjustment (Gonzalez-Ortega et al, 2013; MacBeth and Gumley, 2008; White et al, 2009), long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) (Marshall et al, 2005; White et al, 2009), and cognitive dysfunction (Carlsson et al, 2006; Gonzalez-Blanch et al, 2010; Malla et al, 2002b) have been identified as stronger predictors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%