2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premorbid adjustment trajectories in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A transdiagnostic cluster analysis

Abstract: Despite the overlap between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, neurodevelopmental abnormalities are thought to be associated primarily with schizophrenia. Transdiagnostic and empirical identification of subgroups based on premorbid adjustment (PMA) may enhance understanding of illness trajectories. 160 patients with bipolar I or II disorder (BD; n = 104) or schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (SZ; n = 56) were assessed on PMA course from childhood to late adolescence and current symptoms and functioning… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, there may be substantial heterogeneity of premorbid intellectual functioning in BD, as has been demonstrated in post‐onset patients where some score lower on proxy measures of premorbid cognitive dysfunction and others do not . A recent cross‐diagnostic clustering study also indicated the presence of at least one subgroup comprising ~53% patients with BD and ~47% with SZ that demonstrated poor premorbid academic adjustment relative to controls . Heterogeneity in premorbid factors may have complex implications for BD risk.…”
Section: Trajectory Of Cognitive Functioning In Bdmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, there may be substantial heterogeneity of premorbid intellectual functioning in BD, as has been demonstrated in post‐onset patients where some score lower on proxy measures of premorbid cognitive dysfunction and others do not . A recent cross‐diagnostic clustering study also indicated the presence of at least one subgroup comprising ~53% patients with BD and ~47% with SZ that demonstrated poor premorbid academic adjustment relative to controls . Heterogeneity in premorbid factors may have complex implications for BD risk.…”
Section: Trajectory Of Cognitive Functioning In Bdmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,63,64 A recent cross-diagnostic clustering study also indicated the presence of at least one subgroup comprising ~53% patients with BD and ~47% | 17 VAN RHEENEN Et Al. with SZ that demonstrated poor premorbid academic adjustment relative to controls. 65 Heterogeneity in premorbid factors may have complex implications for BD risk. For example, Parellada et al 16 In so much as the evidence for cognitive impairment as progressive or stable is mixed, it is strikingly clear that much of the findings that speak to the evolution of cognitive impairment in BD is derived from cross-sectional studies that to date, have only considered BD as a single entity and have thus analysed cognitive performance at the group level.…”
Section: Summary and Insights Into Cognitive Trajectories From New mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the symptoms are more evident in SCZ than in BD, studies suggest that these effects lack diagnostic specificity (8,39,(43)(44)(45). Recently, Chan et al (46) performed a cluster analysis based on premorbid adjustment trajectories. All clusters had SCZ and BD, corroborating that clinical differentiation is not specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transdiagnostic clustering supports the existence of diagnostically mixed subtypes across two [4, 2931] or more disorders [3235]. However, previous transdiagnostic clustering studies were limited by small samples and analyzed few disorders or variables [36, 37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth of available data and advances in machine learning intensified efforts to redefine disorder categories using data-driven methods. Previous studies stratified psychiatric disorders mostly by clustering single domains (e.g., psychometry [4][5][6][7][8], neuroimaging [9][10][11][12][13][14], biochemical markers [15], or genetics [16,17]) or disorders (e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD) [5,9,16,[18][19][20] or schizophrenia (SCZ) [21][22][23][24][25][26]). However, these analyses could not unravel shared neurobiological mechanisms, overlapping genetic profiles, and a transdiagnostic symptom continuum [27,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%