2006
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premorbid Predictors of Chronic Fatigue

Abstract: Elevated premorbid stress is a significant risk factor for chronic fatigue-like illness, the effect of which may be buffered by genetic influences. Emotional instability assessed 25 years earlier is associated with chronic fatigue through genetic mechanisms contributing to both personality style and expression of the disorder. These findings suggest plausible mechanisms for chronic fatiguing illness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
102
2
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
102
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…33 In our multivariate analysis, high neuroticism had the greatest numerical point estimate of odds ratio, which indicates a particularly strong association with post-treatment CF, in agreement with observations in long-term testicular cancer survivors. 7 In general, neuroticism has only rarely been evaluated in connection with the treatment of prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…33 In our multivariate analysis, high neuroticism had the greatest numerical point estimate of odds ratio, which indicates a particularly strong association with post-treatment CF, in agreement with observations in long-term testicular cancer survivors. 7 In general, neuroticism has only rarely been evaluated in connection with the treatment of prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Within this account, cognitive behavioural models have become increasingly popular [2][3][4][5]. These models propose a set of predisposing factors (e.g., genetics, personality characteristics, and life events), precipitating factors (e.g., physiological factors and general distress) and perpetuating factors (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioural, and social reactions) that each may contribute to the development and maintenance of CFS [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular the trait 'neuroticism', which is characterized as the degree of emotional instability, associated with a tendency to experience negative emotions, a vulnerability for stress and for psychopathology, may be relevant [33]. First, neuroticism is presumed to be one of the predisposing factors of CFS in [4][5]34] in biopsychosocial accounts. Second, there is preliminary evidence that neuroticism negatively influences illness acceptance and mental wellbeing in CFS [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the exclusion of medical causes of symptoms is important, there are a range of factors that should heighten a clinician's awareness of the possibility of FSS. These can be pre-morbid factors known to be risk factors of FSS, such as being female [2], having prior psychiatric disorders [9,20,21], prior experience of illness in the family and previous unexplained symptoms in the individual [22,23], levels of social adjustment [24] or, as highlighted by Kempke et al's article in this issue, certain personality styles [25], although it is fair to say that evidence on the role of personality and personality disorder is conflicting [24]. Additionally, factors around the way in which an individual describes their symptoms or examination findings may be positive signs of a functional disorder [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%