2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01988.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal and postnatal parental effects on immunity and growth in ‘lactating’ pigeons

Abstract: Summary1. Parental effects can have profound consequences on offspring phenotype. Still, little is known about the relative influence of prenatal versus postnatal parental effects of parasite exposure of parents on offspring traits. 2. In this study, we investigated the respective role of a prenatal and a postnatal immune challenge of parent feral pigeons (Columba livia) on offspring humoral immunity, growth and survival. We used a cross-fostering design and antigen injections in biological and foster parents.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(97 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One month later, a second injection of antigens or saline was performed to increase differences in circulating antibody level of parents. Antigen‐injected biological mothers transmitted more maternal anti‐KLH antibodies to their nestlings (MatAb+ nestlings), compared with sham‐injected biological mothers (MatAb− nestlings) as shown in a previous study (Jacquin, Blottiere, Haussy, Perret, & Gasparini, ). The day of a clutch completion, the first egg of each clutch was collected for antibody assay and the second egg was cross‐fostered with another nest of similar laying date.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One month later, a second injection of antigens or saline was performed to increase differences in circulating antibody level of parents. Antigen‐injected biological mothers transmitted more maternal anti‐KLH antibodies to their nestlings (MatAb+ nestlings), compared with sham‐injected biological mothers (MatAb− nestlings) as shown in a previous study (Jacquin, Blottiere, Haussy, Perret, & Gasparini, ). The day of a clutch completion, the first egg of each clutch was collected for antibody assay and the second egg was cross‐fostered with another nest of similar laying date.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Twenty‐two chicks received an early injection soon after hatching, at the age of 3 days (early‐injected chicks: 11 females, 11 males) and 25 other chicks received a late injection after hatching at the age of 14 days (late‐injected chicks: 16 females, nine males). Eleven days after injection, we took blood samples from the brachial vein and anti‐KLH antibody levels in the plasma were determined using a sandwich ELISA (Hasselquist et al., as described in Jacquin et al., ). Additionally, all chicks came from the second egg in this study, and were raised alone, because the first egg was sampled for antibody assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isaksson et al, 2006) and transmission of immune factors (e.g. Jacquin et al, 2012;Roth et al, 2012) exist in the literature. In addition, females can alter their investment in offspring in response to males' characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Inter-generational Parental Effects On Individual Phenotypicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed the determination of the dynamics of maternal antibodies in the chick plasma to ultimately investigate the interannual dynamics of the transfer and the persistence of maternal antibodies in the chicks. To explore the potential of parental provisioning as an alternative antibody transfer route (e.g., Prevost 1962;Jacquin et al 2012), in 2012 we also sampled stomach oil from ten 5-day-old chicks (five chicks from vaccinated mothers in 2010 and five chicks from nonvaccinated mothers), using blunt-ended 5-mm-diameter plastic cannula attached to a suction bulb (Janssens et al 1999). Additionally, throughout the study period, we opportunistically sampled a few egg yolks from deserted burrows (i.e., nonvisited for 15 days) for which we had already sampled the females (three from vaccinated females and three from control females).…”
Section: Experimental Protocol and Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%