1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1996.tb00697.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal Androgens Defeminize Activation of GnRH Neurons in Response to Estradiol Stimulation

Abstract: To determine if prenatal androgens prevent activation of GnRH neurons in response to estradiol stimulation, Fos colocalization with GnRH was compared in the brains of normal female lambs, normal males, and androgenized females in response to a surge-inducing dose of estradiol. Blood samples were collected every 1-2 h for 6 h before estradiol treatment up to the time of sacrifice at 17-19 h post-treatment. Following perfusion, 60 micrograms coronal brain sections were immunostained for Fos (1:1000, Santa Cruz B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specificity of the antibodies used has been previously assessed by the absorption test (see Alonso, 1988 for anti‐VP and anti‐OT; Arluison et al ., 1984 for anti‐TH; Bras et al ., 1986 for anti‐5HT, Lewis et al ., 1993 for monoclonal anti‐TH; Wood et al ., 1996 for anti‐cFos). Moreover, no fluorescence was detected in controls that consisted of (i) examining sections of brains that had not received injections of retrograde tracers, (ii) exciting each retrograde tracer with an inappropriate wave‐length, (iii) applying extravidin–CY3 onto sections of brains that had not received injections of the anterograde tracer BDA, and (iv) omitting the primary antibodies and applying the secondary antibodies alone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of the antibodies used has been previously assessed by the absorption test (see Alonso, 1988 for anti‐VP and anti‐OT; Arluison et al ., 1984 for anti‐TH; Bras et al ., 1986 for anti‐5HT, Lewis et al ., 1993 for monoclonal anti‐TH; Wood et al ., 1996 for anti‐cFos). Moreover, no fluorescence was detected in controls that consisted of (i) examining sections of brains that had not received injections of retrograde tracers, (ii) exciting each retrograde tracer with an inappropriate wave‐length, (iii) applying extravidin–CY3 onto sections of brains that had not received injections of the anterograde tracer BDA, and (iv) omitting the primary antibodies and applying the secondary antibodies alone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prenatal T-and DHT-treated sheep were generated by intramuscular administration of 100 mg of 1.2 mg/kg T propionate (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) or 100 mg of DHT propionate (Steraloids, Inc.) suspended in cottonseed oil to pregnant ewes twice weekly from Days 30 to 90 of gestation. The doses of T and DHT were chosen to mimic doses used in all our earlier studies [31,32] to enable relating findings from this study to earlier outcomes. Control breeders , KDR, and FLT4 immunostaining in primordial/primary, preantral, and antral follicles.…”
Section: Breeding and Prenatal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oestrogen positive‐feedback mechanism that leads to the pre‐ovulatory GnRH/LH surge is exhibited solely by the females of most species. Male rodents and sheep are unable to mount an LH surge in response to oestrogen positive feedback (11–15). The ability to exhibit oestrogen positive feedback appears to be determined by a sexually dimorphic neural circuit that is established in early neonatal life depending upon gonadal steroid exposure (11, 16–18).…”
Section: Basic Tenets Of Oestrogen Positive Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%