1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92814-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While Carrits et al [16]distinguished between two classes of RhD-negative individuals by molecular study, namely classically RHD-negative with total RHD gene deletion, and those with a grossly intact RHD gene and the D el phenotype, in this report we further observed a class of genuinelly RhD-negative individuals with partial preservation of the RHD gene at the 3′ noncoding region of exon 10 in 4.3% of RhD-negative individuals. Thus, three classes of RhD-negative polymorphisms are present among Chinese in Taiwan, namely D el with a grossly intact RHD gene at exons 4, 5, 7, and 10, and weak RhD antigen expression on the red cells (32.6%, class 1) genuinelly RhD-negative with deletion of the RHD gene at exons 4, 5, 7, and preservation of the 3′ noncoding region of RHD gene at exon 10 (4.3%, class 2), and genuinely RhD-negative with total deletion of the RHD gene (63.0%, class 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Carrits et al [16]distinguished between two classes of RhD-negative individuals by molecular study, namely classically RHD-negative with total RHD gene deletion, and those with a grossly intact RHD gene and the D el phenotype, in this report we further observed a class of genuinelly RhD-negative individuals with partial preservation of the RHD gene at the 3′ noncoding region of exon 10 in 4.3% of RhD-negative individuals. Thus, three classes of RhD-negative polymorphisms are present among Chinese in Taiwan, namely D el with a grossly intact RHD gene at exons 4, 5, 7, and 10, and weak RhD antigen expression on the red cells (32.6%, class 1) genuinelly RhD-negative with deletion of the RHD gene at exons 4, 5, 7, and preservation of the 3′ noncoding region of RHD gene at exon 10 (4.3%, class 2), and genuinely RhD-negative with total deletion of the RHD gene (63.0%, class 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Exceptions with partial RHD gene deletions or no deletions have occasionally been reported in RhD-negative individuals [12, 13, 14, 15]. Carrits et al [16]distinguished between two classes of RhD-negative individuals within some oriental populations: those with total deletion of the RHD gene and total absence of the D antigen, and those with a grossly intact RHD gene and a very low level of antigen detectable only by specialized elution assays. In Daniels’ textbook [13]it was mentioned that Steers et al detected exons 2 and 5 of the RHD gene in genomic DNA from Japanese D el samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model predicted that the RHD gene should encode the RhD protein and the RHCE gene should encode both C/c and E/E proteins, most likely following alternative splicing of a primary transcript (Le Van Kim et al 1992a). Although this general model remains valid, recent findings add further to the genetic complexity of the RH system and indicate that some rare RhD-negative phenotypes (among ddCCee and dCce s complexes) in Australian and Black populations may have arisen from partial deletions, rearrangements, or nonsense mutations of the RHD gene (Hyland et al 1994;Carritt et al 1994). This may also explain the presence of an RhD transcript in Japanese individuals typed as RhD-negative (Kajii et al 1993;Umenishi et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in a recent study it was noted that some RhD-negative individuals contain portions of the RHD gene (Aubin et al, 1997;Carritt et al, 1994;Hyland et al, 1994b). Conversely, some RhD-positive variants (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%